this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
990 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

69804 readers
3197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Up to”…… here’s 5% off

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 1 day ago

Very true. I'm giving you up to* 1000 upvotes.

[–] lookupgeorgism@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philycheeze@sh.itjust.works 125 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Do he still think fascism is good for small businesses though?

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

If they can charge 30% less without Apple's fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don't buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 109 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn't change it then:

Because Apple literally tells people that they're not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago...

[–] patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool! Still not gonna put all my eggs in the fascist-sympathetic basket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring that the judge is an Obama appointee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it's 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

It's nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

15% if you know about it, if you apply, if you get accepted

Good watch on this stuff, the recent court decision overall

Dude’s so vindicated. Apple lover who HATES their treatment of developers cases like this.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I got a Proton two-year subscription that averages out to two dollars and change per month.

I already feel like I got an incredible deal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›