this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2474 readers
293 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I would be perfectly fine with a PCIe 3.0 SSD if that would bring costs down significantly. 8 TB SSDs are still way too expensive despite utilizing QLC.

[โ€“] Doombot1@lemmy.one 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think the headline is a bit optimistic, saying that Samsung & sandisk should be worried. The issue with 128, 64, 32, and even 16TB SSDs is that most enterprises tend to not buy large amounts of them. NAND is so expensive that massive drives like that come with an incredibly high TCO, which businesses dislike. Not to mention the fact that, although still fast, massive SSDs tend to be highly bottlenecked by their architecture.