Asklemmy

Yup! Plenty of smart folks have written about it

A society where production and distribution are fully collectivized and run according to a common plan should be pretty straightforward to imagine. Such a society, where ownership of production is equal across all of society, is both economically compelled by the comditions of today, and classless. I made an introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list, give it a look if you want to see how and why we can get there!

As a side-note, it matters very little whether or not we can "imagine" a form of society. That form of utopianism was why the Owenites, Saint-Simon, etc. failed, and is why Marxism sufficiently advanced into scientific socialism. We must analyze the material conditions of today, how we got here, and where they are leading, not just focus on crafting a better world in our heads and trying to recreate it in reality.

Is it a big enough concern to not go in that direction?

Even if it can't be 100%, wouldn't 99% or even 90% be good, right?

Or is it a theoretical question?

Classes are defined by their relations to the means of production and by contradictions in how society reproduces itself which lead to periodic crisis. Class societies require very complex structures to uphold hegemony of the ruling classes and manage all the crisis and move them in time and space towards other societies or to future generations. Which leads to constant war, environmental destruction, etc and is unsustainable in the long term. Like capitalism needs to expand all the time, which is just impossible on a finite planet and structurally needs to produce devisive ideologies like racism and patriarchy to survive.

A classless society, once achieved, doesn't need all this. Getting there requires a lot of struggle because the ruling class has set up all those structures to protect their privilege. But once we're there, society will actually be way more stable than before. No classes means that structures to uphold hegemony aren't necessary any more. That includes the state, which is really just a weapon in class warfare. Racism and patriarchy aren't human nature. They are constantly fabricated and upheld with huge efforts by the ruling class. Those efforts would be free to build other structures instead. Once that actual connect people instead of driving them against each other. No inherent periodic crisis means those don't have to be managed anymore and society can actually continue to develop sustainably without exploiting to exhaustion natural resources, human minds and bodies, communities and societal bonds and care structures like families.

It's hard for us to imagine, because we're so used to thinking inside class societies. It even forms our anthropology, how we think of other people and our ability to emphasize with them. But future people who live it will have a hard time imagining how it could ever have been different.

Yes, a society where everyone is equal in dignity is both conceivable and achievable, and furthermore worthwhile to pursue.

Yep, I just conceived it right now!

But in reality, experience, wisdom, intelligence and strength are valuable: in the same way a parent is 'in charge' of a child, every tribe will almost be default have one or more leaders. That doesn't mean everything they say has to be obeyed though.

I mean if someone can conceive it then yes.

Personally I do think there will always be a "class" of some sort since even among career and financial equals I still view colleagues as a different class of human.

Like I'm a camp in the woods kinda human where my coworker is a take his car to a race track kinda human.

But that's never the class that is being discussed.

A classless society is specifically one where someone doesn't have power over you by some financial measure. A true meritocracy as there is no financial incentive to be in those roles since it is also a moneyless society.

Utopian? Maybe. Conceivable? Yeah I can conceive what that would be like and I want to strive for it.

Maybe its not important if its possible and its just important that there are people willing to work towards it or implement something like it in their own controllable way.

Like kings and emperors? We got rid of them.

It is conceivable.

For example, imagine a society like ours but where everyone, no matter their wealth, has to do essential jobs, taking turns. For example everyone in your city needs to be a garbage collector for one week every 2 years, or they need to work in hospitals to help clean patients for a week every year, maybe you need to work in the fields for a month every 2 years, basically all jobs that people only do because they can't do anything less tiresome plus jobs that are now almost fully automated to produce essentials but still require some labour.

In that system, you'd always have enough workforce to give everyone enough food, homes, healthcare and education to live, while people might still work at secondary non-essential jobs, voluntarily, and gaining a bit more to have their fancy cars and yatch.

This is a conceptual society where, despite the possibility for individual differences, you don't really have classes, because no matter if you were born in poverty or you are Elon Musk, you all have to take part on essential services equally.

No to the title question.

Yes to the question in the body of the post.