this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
305 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

2764 readers
261 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am sure this article has been shared before, however I wanted to have a look at this topic.
The articles short summary is this:

All 25 car brands we researched earned our *Privacy Not Included warning label – making cars the worst category of products that we have ever reviewed

I am currently driving a 2014 Ford Fiesta which just has a radio with a CD player and Bluetooth. I do not need more than that in a car.

The reason I am looking at all is that that the Fiesta does not belong to me and the friend owning it will be moving out in a bit, so I kinda need another one.

There seems to be one brand that is not as bad as the other ones (but still bad): Renault; mozilla's review...
Maybe I will have a look at their cars.

What do you guys think? Stick to older used cars and not use an EV or look at which of the manufacturers have the least bad privacy policy?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] astutemural@midwest.social -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agegamon@beehaw.org 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

I bought a used Chevy bolt EV, for now I've pulled the onstar system fuse which kills the telemetry and GPS+cell antenna. No tracking with no power, it's my car and my battery so I decide what gets my power.

I'm not interested in letting any of these companies screw me over behind my back regardless of who is "less evil," but I've gotten so used to the convenience of EVs that I won't do without one.

I use my phone for navigation and music/podcasts and that still works just fine.

Might at some point look at a more sophisticated way of doing this like removing just the onstar module or terminating its antenna, but for now it's fine.

[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've pulled the onstar system fuse which kills the telemetry and GPS+cell antenna

If that is possible in a european car that would be exactly what I'd want to do as well :D

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s almost certainly possible, but it might void your warranty/be illegal, depending on your jurisdiction (and qualifications- it’s probably not illegal if you’re a licensed mechanic, but might violate your employment contract). Even if it’s not illegal, it might affect your liability insurance coverage.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t do it, but make sure you know what the potential consequences are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] artifex@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I had been actively looking forward to the Slate truck (even though I don't want a truck) for this reason - an EV with modern drivetrain but no BS electronics or telemetry. Unfortunately the price has gone from about $20K - a price appropriate for it's minimalist approach - to "below $30K" and it's not due out for another year, so who knows how it will pan out.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Seeing how Bezos is involved it will start small and then jack up the prices as demand for it goes up. Probably even last minute fees for those on waiting lists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

List of automotive connectivity module providers: https://www.evbusiness.net/ev-directory/automotive-lte-5g-module-manufacturers/

Find which one your car has. Then see if you can find a repair manual with schematics. Find where the cell antenna connects. Non-destructively disconnect it. This way your telematics won't be affected. It will just look like you're always in a cell dead-zone.

Edit: don't do this if it's a lease, a rental, or there's a loan on the vehicle. If you own it outright and it doesn't void the warranty, go nuts.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Well that's it, I'm just going to drive my 23-year-old 350Z Roadster forever. As a 90s computer geek, I would have never imagined that future technology would turn me into a classic car guy, yet here we are.

I miss the days when spyware was treated like a virus; now it's the norm.

[–] jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Late 90s and early through mid 2000s cars are gems as they are still very reliable as well as easy to maintain. Being a privacy advocate in this day and age practically requires you to get a cheap wrench set and learn the basics of maintaining one of these era vehicles.

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2000s car is classic car

☠️☠️☠️ i feel old.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago (10 children)

None of this has anything to do with the car's powertrain. Regular internal combustion engine cars are just as bad as EVs in this regard.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody said it does. OP said "buy an old car without all of this shit even though it won't be electric or suck it up"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

The article is from 2023, it is likely several orders of magnitude worse now.

Imo, the sweet spot for reliability and unconnected tech is the mid 2000s to 2015ish. Good engine control, simple user interfaces with buttons, nice creature comforts, good fuel efficiency, and still good safety (generally)

I have a 2019 wrx that while I like it, I know the subaru telemetry is both significant and easy to access, there has been a number of articles about it published in the last year or two. There are opt out procedures through subaru but let's not kid ourselves here do you really trust them to do it? How do you prove they have stopped?

That said, your phone shares all that data already, it being shared by another device is not really much different than coming from one source.

(Edit: since some of you missed what I was trying to convey here, I was trying to point out that the exercise of securing your car is half the battle, yes you SHOULD do that, any reduction in data sharing is a positive thing. You should also be realistic about how much that actually accomplishes when you are also carrying your cell phone with you in your car.)

What I really don't like is the driver aids. My mom has a newer Mercedes suv and it is realllllllly intrusive. The auto brake function as awful, it auto does corrective steering. I am sure in an actual panic situation I would welcome it but I absolutely do not like it on normal situations. I also don't trust it from a cyber security situation.

[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That said, your phone shares all that data already, it being shared by another device is not really much different than coming from one source.

That is imo neither here or there. It is about the car. "Another device is also bad so its irrelevant" is just not a good response.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

your phone doesn't share data from your cars sensors with your insurance company.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

I have a 2014 Chevy volt. Not a full EV, but used ones are affordable and the 3g cell modem no longer works.

We get 30-38 miles per charge depending on the outside temperature which covers most of our day to day driving. It will charge from a regular wall outlet (120v at 8 amps) in 12 hours. The ICE engine gets an oil change every 2 years since it gets rarely used.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is a lose-lose-lose.

  • New cars don't respect people's privacy.
  • New cars cost more due to the extra camera/sensors/compute/connectivity necessary for tracking.
  • Less people buy new cars due to increased cost and tracking. Instead drive older, more polluting cars for longer.
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe 3 of the 4 wheels need tightening?
So it's a loose-loose-loose-tight situation when it should be a tight-tight-tight-tight situation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And all of a sudden data roaming costs isn't an issue anymore ;) Who pays the mobile subscription? Or do car manufacturers pay the telco's with a part of the data gathered ....

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Yes, the OEMs pay for it. They get sims that are prepaid for like 10 years.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you're going with another Ford, you should be good to get one as new as 2017, since that's the last year they used 3g cell radios. It can't report back since the network was shut down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Fun fact, French auto brands are defacto banned in the US. You can’t insure them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I have an older Nissan Leaf in Australia. While I'm sure the car is trying to send telemetry, it only has a 3G modem, and the 3G network has been switched off for all of Australia.

If you have a newer car, it may be possible to remove the telematics fuse and ignore the related DTC.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suppose you'll have to settle for an e-bike, and even those are increasingly electronic. Maybe retrofitting a standard bike with an electric engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't own a car and am not a fan of most modern "features", but, I must say, I'm quite fond of adaptive cruise control. Setting a follow distance and just cruising for long drives is far better than pumping the brakes every 5 minutes for folks mucking up passing lanes or trucks attempting to overtake on lane-limited roadways. I bet if everyone used it, traffic snakes wouldn't be such a nuisance.

I'd rather never own a car, but if I needed one, I'd be hard pressed to sacrifice privacy for that sweet adaptive cruise. Of course, network connectivity isn't required, so perhaps there will eventually be options.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

We need more development of open source cars

[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'd love this, but I doubt that it is ever going to happen. Open-Source-Hardware is not as widely spread as open source software which is also still a niche. The big difference is that you can easily develop OSS on your own in your free time, but with hardware its a lot more difficult. And then think of all the parts necessary to build a car and then again all the certifications to actually get it on the street and after that the question of liability in case of accidents....

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] signofzeta@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I bought a used Chevy Bolt, then disconnected the antenna to put a dummy load on the OnStar transmitter. Never told it my Wi-Fi password. It can’t connect to the Internet unless I park it next to a cell tower, unless I pay for OnStar, which I refuse to do. I only use CarPlay so it can’t even hope to use my phone’s Bluetooth tethering (not that it seems capable).

Fortunately, Chevy’s only OTA infotainment update was to remove the video player, so I’m not missing much. Unplug the power cord and drive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›