this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

3215 readers
327 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

...but one thing remains the same: it still sucks.

[–] AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure what experience with Java you are talking about. As a Dev, modern Java still rock solid and is finally quite convenient to use and the JVM itself is a great runtime.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As an admin who has to update it, work with it, or interact with it from a workstation or server, it's a terrible experience.

[–] AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, that I can understand. But any modern Java application should be shipped as a container were this isn't an issue.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"My car is super reliable, but only if you put it on the back of a big flatbed truck."

[–] AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't see how you'd have any less problems with a natively installed Node.js, Python or PHP application. This is not a Java specific issue.

[–] Deifyed@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's millions of lines more code. In a dockerized world, there is zero reason to use another virtualization layer

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Java isn't any of those.