this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
602 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26807 readers
2366 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's popularity in the metropolis has surged since his election last month, according to a new poll.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arc99@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

Seems a little premature until he is sworn in and delivers on his promises

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wonder how the Democratic party will ratfuck this guy.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

They’ll block his policies and allow special interests to run attack ads, then will savage him in the next primary that he was ineffective at carrying out his policies.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 203 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Weird how these progressive candidates keep having very high approval ratings while the moderates/secret Republicans get much lower approvals. Maybe we need to pick more of the progressive candidates.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And it's getting harder to distinguish. I mean... look at Jasmine Crockett, since Mamdani's win, liberals have started cosplaying as progressives. You can tell, because the only thing they do is point out the problems, but never propose a solution, while people like Bernie and Mamdani didn't stop with pointing out "healthcare and housing are expensive", they ran on actual solutions like medicare and rent-freezing.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Ok how does a mayor solve cost of living and medical issues. I'm not American do Mayors there have special powers?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

Mamdani ran on making the buses free [at point of use, in case someone felt the need to argue this], creating city owned groceries stores to close food desert gaps and provide competition to keep prices down at private stores, and doing something to stop landlords forcing people out of their rent controlled apartments.

Most of which is within a mayor's power

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

they can't directly. but indirectly they can have local tools to reduce costs. foremost is to increase supply. other ways would be tax credits/abatements, city-sponsored clinics, etc.

they can't solve it, but they can reduce costs. the problem, however, is often such programs are politically very unpopular and the voters tend to get bent out of shape over their 'unfairness'.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Bernie ran on medical issues, Zohran ran on cost of living and housing. https://www.zohranfornyc.com/platform

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I had a dollar for every time a Republican friend told me, “how are we going to pay for these things” with it acknowledging the progressives have solutions for that.

[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah bro we can pivot right and get moderates. Please bro just one more drift to the right I swear bro, we'll get the moderate republicans this time!

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if we became republicans? Then they’d have to vote for us!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago

Turns out people actually do like it when your policies are aimed at helping them do better, as opposed to robbing them of what little they have left.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Had he even entered office yet?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What to pre-pubescent testicles have to do with this?

[–] lemmyseikai@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NYC has the ball drop at new year.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was clearly making a joke.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So like, do New Yorkers hold their balls until new years? Dont they get tired?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's where the Mandani socialism comes in.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

A burden shared is a burden halved

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 32 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Oddly enough I've seen the purported progressives on here already trying to claim he's bad on a few occasions.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

i most see then angry he's not a far left communist and only a 'mere' social democrat.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Hate to break it to you, but people can lie about what they believe and who they are...

Especially on the internet.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

No one knows youre a dog on the internet

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Really? But he's basically a progressive dream come true? Maybe because his Trump visit? But he really did great there too.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

when all you have is a wedge, everything is a crack

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There is absolutely room for criticism against Zohran. I wholeheartedly support that voting for him was still the correct choice and I hope he really does unleash significant progressive policy for NYC. I also believe he deserves the criticism for manufacturing consent for action against Venezuela and Cuba by [calling their presidents dictators] (https://blackallianceforpeace.com/movement-news/zohran-mamdani) in the context of today's likelihood of attack against the former; and for his redundancy on pinning the Isntreali genocide of Palestinians on October 7th.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

they are dictators. most of the world sees them as dictators.

whether or not that justifies military action is another question, but they are certainly not freely elected representatives, anymore than Putin is. And the countries that do recognize the legitimacy of their elections... are also dictatorships.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com -1 points 6 days ago

not freely elected

They definitely aren't freely elected. You can't have free elections when the US government is interfering in them by sanctions.

As stated in the memorandum on the sanctions in the office of the historian governmental website:

The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent) [...] The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship. [...] every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Wait until he starts making policy. Then see if you’re still thrilled. We’v been disappointed in the past.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 22 points 6 days ago

I'd rather have him fail on half of his policies than Cuomo implement all of his.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

some things are more do-able than others. Free buses is easy. bringing down rents, not so much.

I’m more concerned with performative things like (hypothetically) making it ok to paint rainbow crosswalks vs. taxing billionaires or allowing ICE to go uncontrolled in the Boroughs.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The optimist in me wants you to shut up but the realist in me knows that will be the true test.

Agreed. Sucks being a lib/progressive and being constantly disappointed in some way by your leadership. Meanwhile, the right sets everything on fire, including themselves, and parties like it’s 2099.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Helps when you don't have billionaire-funded FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) blasted at you every day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›