this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
245 points (98.8% liked)

Science

15964 readers
29 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 54 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Audiophiles when they can’t tell the difference between lossless and 320kbps mp3:

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

me listening to music I encoded at ~90 kbps opus

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When I was younger I would listen to music recorded on my phone from the radio. They were 128 kb/s, which sounds OK until you see they're .wav files so they don't use the bitrate effectively: just mono, 32kHz sample rate, 4 bits per sample. They sound worse than 24 kb/s MP3s, which is something you'd stream over a 28k modem in 1999!

(The SoC can and does do AMR compression when recording MPEG-4 (more specifically 3GP4, which uses MPEG-4 part 2, not the well-known AVC, which is MPEG-4 part 10) video but the manufacturer just didn't take advantage of it, maybe the library for video recording was proprietary and the AMR codec not well documented.)

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Things are better now, mostly.

I used to record songs from the TV and TELETEXT "radio"... to tape.

load more comments (4 replies)

If you are using a digital signal out that is being converted to analog at the receiver with decent speakers you can tell the difference between FLAC and 256kbps. I can't tell the difference at 320kbps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Are we making banana phone happen?

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 32 points 3 months ago

What could it cost, ten dollars?

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago

Ring ring ring ring ring……

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The article is interesting, and I would not spend the crazy amounts that some people do on cables, but cable quality does still matter.

First of all, the article says that one area it definitely does make a difference is:

Interference-prone environments: Poorly shielded cables can pick up interference, affecting signal quality. However, these tests show a broader point. Detecting audible differences is surprisingly difficult when visual cues, price, and expectation are removed. Without context or labels, even ridiculous conductors fail to produce reliably noticeable changes.

However, the tests arent testing for interference at all. They're performed openly on a desk without much around, but it then goes on to conclude:

If wet mud and bananas don’t degrade the signal in ways listeners can detect, then subtle improvements from expensive cables are even less likely to be audible. In other words, the threshold for hearing real differences is far higher than marketing often implies.

Like yes, there is obviously marketing hype, especially if buying a name brand cable, but the quality of shielding legitimately can make a difference, especially if you're running it alongside power cables / extension cords.

The other factor that can make a difference, has nothing to do with audio quality but just physical convenience, in that pure Copper cables will be more expensive, but thinner and more flexible, then Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA). CCA is cheaper, and if your runs are static and unmoving there's zero issue with it, but if you're moving your speakers around a bunch, the stiffness compared to copper can be annoying.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago

CCA cables break if they are moved a lot. I've had trouble with CCA ethernet cables breaking.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Over the years my relative has spent allot of money on these non balanced audio cables. Every time he 'upgrades' he says it sounds so much better. I hear no difference. Then he puts the volume up so my ears hurt and asks if i can hear it. I just smile at that point.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

When I was like 4 years old, our neighbor had a fancy sound system he showed off to us. Next time he was at our house, I walked over to our TV to show him it could do the same thing, by just turning it up really loud.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I figure it's like I used to feel that my engine ran smother after getting an oil change. The brain is weird and can't be trusted.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

I mean depends how bad you let your oil get.

When I met my wife she mentioned her car had trouble going up hill, I suggested a 5 (new to her for 1 year) year old car should be fine at going up hill.

Turns out she had never heard that you need to change oil, the dipstick showed no oil at all.

Oil change definitely made her car drive smoother 😀

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wait Can I be the conductor? Wireless is cool but Bluetooth is kinda iffy.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Depends. Are you a banana?

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] B0rax@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago

And then power a murderous, snarky AI.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago

Fun fact, the French version of this line translates to "I am a clothes moth wearing a sweater". It's kind of a classic too.

[–] adb@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Anything can be a conductor if the signal is strong enough

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Technically! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_conduction

(Disclaimer: I know this isn't what you meant, but the wordplay is fun)

[–] ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

If audible differences were present, they failed to provide reliable markers for identification. And although a slight listener preference for the banana recordings emerged, it didn’t correlate with accuracy.

Hell yes, 2026 the year of banana hi-fi meta 🤘

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

I bought and installed Monster cables for my fairly high end (Not audiophile) HiFi setup in the 80s. Oxygen free copper yada yada. It's true that they are fat conductors (good), very flexible sheathing (good), transparent (cool), but I could have saved a bunch by using fat plain electrical cables.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

This surprising similarity prompted an important clarification: the test didn’t rely on exotic or high-end gear. It used ordinary consumer gear like a laptop, a USB audio interface, and standard recording software.

Well this could be part of the reason other than the banana ,etc, just adding resistance.

But you'd have to vet your random participants. Like for instance my wife's phone speaker is terrible and she turns it up to 100% to watch videos. She doesn't notice anything wrong, but for me the distortion and clipping hurts my head. Some people just dont "hear" bad audio.

[–] jcorvera@quokk.au 6 points 3 months ago

I mean, Monty at Xiph.org is on file for stating that Hi-Res music is snake oil.

FLAC is great for critical listening and Jukebox mode. Otherwise, a decent Opus file on a modern DAP works fine.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

My experience with cables is that they do matter, especially on the interconnect side, but price has very little to do with the perceived difference in fidelity or sound signature.

As for interference and shielding, yes this can indeed make a difference, but it's rarely an issue unless we are trying to measure the noise floor, or using a really weirdly balanced levels. (like very quiet source attached to an amp that is cranked to max)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Help, in an effort to save money I connected my tube amp to my speakers with bananas and I'm not getting the rich, lossless sound quality I was led to expect from this headline, in fact unless the speakers are broken, the banana doesn't work very well as an audio cable

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Baizey@feddit.dk 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Which banana species did you use? It has a huge impact

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

as i've come to realize from trying to troubleshoot why my speakers sometimes give me a headache, it turns out none of this makes the slightest fucking difference if people can't master their audio for shit.

So many youtubers are putting out borderline unlistenable videos, and then i find the one person who doesn't fuck it up and holy fuck i can actually hear what they're saying

load more comments
view more: next ›