this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

16131 readers
6 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 105 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Can't believe people always use this crypto-spam browser.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same, I was surprised brave is so popular.

[–] Valarie@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I use it for school shit because they don't work with iceraven(my preferred mobile Firefox fork)

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use it to pirate sports streams and thats pretty much it. It just works better than Firefox for some reason.

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

Probably because it's chromium based and the sites are chromium optimized

That's my opinion at least

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brave and Firefox are very competitive when it comes to pushing unnecessary "features" on their users. (Remember when Mozilla bought an NFT and AI company to put a shopping toolbar in their browser?)

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Comparing brave and fire fox is like comparing librewolf and chrome. When people suggest using a privacy browser other than brave, they’re not saying “just use fire fox”.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

I'm just speaking on the two most popular browsers according to the survey - LibreWolf is in a league of its own for sure.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, it does do a fantastic job of removing ads and reducing fingerprinting.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (23 children)

So does Librewolf. What's the benefit of brave? Chrome-based? Checked chromium from time to time and don't think chrome is superior over Firefox.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Neither do I. I use Mullvad Browser, which is based on Firefox.

Brave has its own content blocking system, which is on-par with uBO and better than uBO Lite. I tested it myself a while back, and Cover Your Tracks, Fingerprint.com, and CreepJS indicated that it was incredibly difficult to fingerprint: moreso than Librewolf, but slightly less so than Tor/Mullvad.

That said, however, PrivacyTests.org indicates that Librewolf blocks more tracking technologies than Brave, so it's possible things have changed since I last experimented with browsers other than Tor and Mullvad.

[–] Sustolic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

WebHID support which some webapp configuration tools need to function

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] digital_digger@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is Thunderbird listed with proton mail, tuta and fastmail?

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They are a provider as well as a client now.

[–] digital_digger@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. So you can actually create a Thunderbird email address?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think the statistics are representative of the overall userbase? To me, this suggests recency bias (or maybe people who misunderstood the question, because it made me do a double-take too). Either way, Thunderbird using its established branding and reputation is a great move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Surprised privacy conscious people are so pro obsidian when it's not even source available

[–] holomorphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It keeps my data in plain text files, integrates well with git and simply does the most things I always wanted a note taking application to do, when compared with anything else I have tried so far.

Yes, I would be happier with an open source application, but the first two are hard requirements for me, which already removes the majority of the alternatives.

On the other hand, I will never understand why anyone would use brave, given how shady the thing is.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

what about logseq? It's very similar, but open source

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] holomorphic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Does support internal links, md rendering and a useful search over all files without having to configure everything for three weeks? Because those features were what made me switch after a few years of just using vim.

Also having dynamic todo boxes on my daily notes, collected from all my ~1k notes.

Those are actual questions, not sarcasm, btw. I have never used nvim. I was under the impression it was more or less just vim.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Emacs supports whatever you want and more with org-mode. It's an upfront investment but you can use your config until you die.

[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ever used org-roam? It's org-mode plus obsidian features. Absolutely love it.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah I should have said it explicitly but that's what I was referring to. I have an org-mode / org-roam setup.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably because it is all portable and in markdown, the devs are widely available and it is open enough that community, open source plugins can be easily made which allow you to make custom workflows that simply aren't available in any alternatives.

Linking is significantly easier and better than any alternative I have tried which significantly lowers the effort of documentation which is the largest hurdle for most people. As all social media shit apps have taught us, ultra low-effort beginning of a habit is the key to consistent use.

And if the dev enshittifies, all of your notes are safe in plaintext markdown and not a proprietary format and can be imported and cleaned up in your choice of new editor and fix the linking.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 17 points 1 month ago

Matrix is the protocol. Element is the client and just one of many.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How can Thunderbird be the third favourite Email service, when it's not even an email service? It's a mail user agent.

Or do they mean the Thundermail service available in the Thunderbird Pro Subscription?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ItsMyVault101@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Do you need an account to use Proton VPN?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you download it from the FDroid store, yes. If you download it from the Google Play Store, no.

(I just tested this to make sure, because I know it sounds weird.)

[–] ItsMyVault101@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

so either way is Mullvad VPN much more privacy focused, because there you just generate a random number and to this number you deposit money, no need for any credentials.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ok so if you do it through google play it uses your google account I assume with like something like saml.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes but it is free (email address) with an acces to 5 countries (Netherlands, Romania, Japan and 2 others i never used). To extend it worldwide you have to subscribe to a premium account.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ItsMyVault101@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I was asking because I used Mullvad in the past and I love the fact that not even they know who you are because to them you are just a random generated number, which occasionally gets 5€ deposited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm considering swapping from Proton Mail to Fastmail. The fact that it allows 3-year subscriptions is good (I'd prefer a lifetime plan but I understand why that's a non-starter), the fact that it's based local to me is good too.

EDIT: I wish it also at least offered a rolling 3-year subscription.

[–] ne0phyte@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

+1 for Fastmail

Since anything but fully on-device encrypted/decrypted mails is still inherently insecure due to being unable to control the receiving end I consider email an insecure medium by default.

That was my reason to go with fastmail when I moved away from Gmail a couple of years ago and I am very happy with their service and apps. I am also paying three years at a time and would like to pay even further ahead of time, but what can you do.

I tried proton but didn't like being locked into using their apps or hosting the SMTP bridge at which point I might as well use a less secure approach to begin with that is more comfortable to use.

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fastmail is hosted in Australia which has some iffy privacy laws thst may affect fadtmail (although fastmail won't sell your data at least) https://www.e4237161d240bc6333d6834ce-19834.sites.k-hosting.co.uk/showthread.php?s=23fc90acb4f52ac90ee43d800bb66a77&t=74082

I have moved to mailbox.org which has been great too. Just offering an alternative in case you are interested in a European host

[–] nmrb@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I also made the switch to mailbox after trying out proton and tuta. I have no regrets with the decision after a year in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know I just remembered that no one actually confirmed whether DuckDuckGo wasn't just a honeypot for the NSA because it didn't become big until after thr Snowden leaks lol.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

well I still don't get how are they legitimately funding their services, even before they started running their free AI chat proxy.

load more comments
view more: next ›