They're still obsessed with that photo of that one liberal woman from like 2012, aren't they?
Why do they think it's a burn? Because she's showing emotion? I don't get it.
this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14197 readers
29 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Because they think it is an "own" to say that a woman caught mid-sneeze is unattractive and therefore worthless as a woman, it ties into their "theory" about feminism just being pushed by "ugly women" who can't get laid. See also: Anti-suffragette posters from the early 20th century. This is just the modern version of that. "A woman? Stepping out of line? We'd better call her ugly, that will show her!"
They've got them both. Also the crying one when Trump was elected initially right by her.
They have the weirdest grievances istg.
They really have to come up with more and more excuses to think about Hunter's hog don't they?
"Hog delivery! Hog delivery's here!"
spoiler
Age: 21+
Yeah, somehow I doubt this game has any more mechanical complexity or player control than Snakes and Ladders.
Why do I get the feeling that this board game is intended for that one specific family member all Americans seem to have, who they only see on the holidays. The sort of person who thinks that forcing their family to sit down and play a boring and tedious board game like this will "own the libs" or whatever.
Only if we can play my favorite board game afterwards
I don’t want to. I need to.
I feel like we could've made a way better version of this and used the profits to do mutual aid