DickFiasco

joined 2 years ago
[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still acting like there's ever going to be a (meaningful) election again.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Only fraudsters will complain"

I smell a "no true Scotsman" fallacy here.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

What book? Just so I know to avoid it.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now hold on, we don't yet know if he was transgender or not.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Later, virgins!

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Instructions unclear; now I'm dizzy as well as confused.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I take back every bad thing I've ever said about AI. This is peak art.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Red Hat: teacher's pet

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Submitting proof that you're not a bot definitely has some pros and cons. In this comment, I will discuss the reasons why someone may want to submit proof that they are not a bot:

  • to prove that they are not a bot
  • to prove that they are a human
  • both of the above

In conclusion, there are many reasons why you may want to prove that you're not a bot, and you should use your best judgement before making your decision.

view more: ‹ prev next ›