EarlGrey

joined 2 months ago
[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My criticism is that it largely ignores the primary advantage of Fediverse services (Decentralizing services that are designed to operate Centrally), while mostly explaining what I've always considered to be the most pointless feature (Cross Service posting).

It's a mildly neat feature if you want to centralize your entire social profile under one account (which is my security nightmare but you do you), but its not really fundamental to using federated services and its implementation can be inconsistent and confusing.

Maybe have a bunch of "Lemmy" (or whatever) nodes arranged in a circle, the same color, with the same icon, and connected to each other through the middle of the circle (not connecting to the "fediverse", although I guess you could have a transparent "Lemmy" super imposed over it) Then have the users connected to each node. Or something...I'm on a bench and just broadly visualizing it.

The next trick is explaining the fault of centralized services in a graph.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Requiring someone to have an account on a federated instance would mitigate a fair amount of spam and ease moderation.

What would that solve that mandating accounts for a standard wiki wouldn't?

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Can you elaborate on "discoverability"? Finding individual subject wikis has never been a particular problem for me. Even ones that don't use Fandom, provided they are at least active. Just googling " wikia" (I know. I can't let it go) always gets me what I need.

Can't say I see an advantage to universal accounts (I see more disadvantages), but if that's the big selling point and people really want it. I'm not opposed to having it, i've just always treated it as a mild novelty I never use.

As for decentralization, it has already been solved by MediaWiki. Which is GPL and (can be) self-hosted.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

What benefit would federating it bring?

The ability to self-host your own FOSS wiki already exists and has for over two decades. It's called MediaWiki.

You could have federated accounts I guess but do editors on the Doctor Who wiki really need the ability to see posts on Mastadon or edit pages on the That 70's Wiki?

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago

I feel like in the future we're gonna start seeing fediverse servers differentiate on feature sets.

Like one requires a subscription fee but pays for yearly audits by a respected auditor, or another offers spam-filtering, etc.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 weeks ago

Debian XFCE or Xubuntu LTS.

xfce is stubbornly slow at introducing new features, but it is absolutely rock-solid. Hell I don't think they've changed their icon set in some 20 years.

Debian and *buntu LTS are also likewise slow feature updaters that focus on stability.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, sure I'd like to give it a look

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 weeks ago

Message Boards are fundamentally different and I don't see a lot of value in federating them considering the big message board platform (phpBB) has 25 years of development and is GPL.

Message Boards are more elaborate versions of subreddits/communities. In all of those instances there is still a single entity that has "all the power in the forum". You can join another lemmy server, but the admin of that community is still the admin, and the entity controlling the server that community is on likewise, controls the community.

I guess you could have a universal account that could be used across different message boards, but Personally I'd hate that.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And you missed the entire point. Centrism isn't about trying to find a perfect middle ground to every individual subject.

Of course there will be centrists that support Israel carpet bombing everything. There are other centrists that don't support them. There are some that will support them with conditions. I know someone who is broadly centrist who thinks Israel should be dissolved entirely.

It's not a fucking hivemind.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Centrists don't sit in the middle of every issue or make an exact 50/50 compromise on everything.

I seriously don't understand how fucking difficult this is to understand. It's why I largely ignore political discussions on Reddit/Lemmy/all social media.

I don't look at one person saying "Murdering 5 year olds is bad", look at another person saying "Murdering 5 year olds is good!" and try to find a way where both are right.

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I will spend an entire weekend ricing my desktop in just the right way.

Then I'll notice that one of my main apps doesn't adhere to the theming i've designed, or that will completely break my theming because , or If I change my wallpaper it will make my entire theme look like shit, or that my cool theme makes font unreadable on one app because it renders shit weird, or that I completely overlooked this one aspect of my workflow that my cool design fucks with.

Then I'll just say fuck it and go back to using standard Gnome.

There's an extension that lets me close and open windows with the Matrix Code Rain so I can pretend I'm cool n shit.

view more: ‹ prev next ›