Everyone else but you seems to get it. It wasn't subtle.
ExtantHuman
joined 3 weeks ago
That is not even remotely true.
Maybe next time you'll be more clear when referring to a topic that is not the subject of the article you commented on. I actually assumed you were from the UK where public and private schools mean something closer to what you were saying but actually about secondary schools.
So, again. Not obvious
No, That's a PR company, which specializes in the abstract concept of relating to the public. If you just say PR you're not talking about an organization
You're "obviously" referring to colleges while commenting on an article that is specifically referring to primary and secondary schools...
Get into public schools?
These are not colleges. They have to accept everyone.
Unfortunately that poll had some very loaded wording in it that doesn't necessarily lead to the conclusion it's trying to present
How is speaking to the public not public relations?...
Attorneys aren't cops. Can we stop with the right wing smear campaign?
The Dipshit didn't even get the majority of people who did vote, let alone the country as a whole
Third parties haven't even gotten a house rep yet. We have partyless reps but no third party reps. Start there is it has to be federal. State game is shit too. If you can't even do those, running for president is a joke and a waste of ballot space
You don't see it?
You're assuming that because they want more candidates to obstruct the current administration, that they would also prefer those candidates and throw actual policies in every other situation.
Because they mixed progressive and opposing the admin together in one question, you can't tell which part is really what they're agreeing with.
Using this specific question to claim they want more progressive candidates is futile. This is basic polling literacy stuff...