LWD

joined 1 year ago
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Yep, Carrotcypher is in the mod list.

https://hub.fosstodon.org/team/

I presume the admins just don't know about this. They also moderate over 50 subreddits, including the Mastodon one. They tend to be the controlling moderator, or the top moderator that is regularly active.

Doing my best to compile more content about it...

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, there's more where this came from. I've got a little backlog of content

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

How does this affect people who upgrade? They just have Firefox plus a second browser?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think the purpose is to find a source of revenue so that they don't have to ruin their product. There's a lot of potential good here, in addition to the unfortunately undeniable potential bad.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Until the lawsuit between Steve Teixeira and Mozilla reveals the truth, I'm going to withhold my judgment about how fascistic Mozilla was internally.

Teixeira claimed Mozilla conducted an audit that found them pretty lacking in the equality department IIRC, and Mozilla's own lawyers disputed many things but not that.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can close a group and reopen it later.

I thought tab groups on the desktop were neat but ignorable... Until browser vendors started implementing stuff like this. Now it's basically a halfway point between an open tab and a bookmark. Excellent for organization.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

My YouTube alternative: still YouTube, but I screw them out of ad revenue with a dedicated account and third party apps

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I find the moderation on r/privacy especially pernicious because the moderator creating and enforcing these rules also has footing on the Fediverse - they moderate the FOSStodon server.

 

Heise blacklisted

The post

After Trump's decree: fight for US funding for Tor, F-Droid and Let's Encrypt

Censored, all comments locked.

The removal reason

Site is NOT privacy-friendly since it requires agreeing to allow them to use tracking cookies on end device for personalized add and content. Now blacklisted.  ......... Please use a credible source, and try to link to the original author’s work, not a blog trying to steal their thunder (or clicks).

Why this is bullshit

This is not a normal removal message. Most of this removal reason is from a template, the portion including "Now blacklisted" was manually added and has never been used before.

Heise is based in Germany, where the best privacy laws (the GDPR) are enforced strictly. If this site is blacklisted, then any site can be blacklisted.

"Please link to a credible source" is part of the original community rules, and maybe the moderator who edited the message forgot to remove it, because Heise is credible.

US border security questions are suppressed

The post

Traveling into the US with an iphone: question about border security  [question tag] ....... So I've read that you should delete any apps that may have anti-Trump content (social media, WhatsApp, etc.), but even if you factory reset your phone, all the phone messages are still there, right? ........ Is there a way to save text messages in the cloud and have them NOT on your phone (and restore them later)?  ......... Maybe just traveling with a burner phone is the only way.  ......... I just saw two stories of American citizens being detained at airports and ICE searching their phones for anti-Trump stuff.

Censored, all comments locked.

The removal reason

Your submission could be seen as being unreliable, and/or spreading FUD concerning our privacy mainstays, or relies on faulty reasoning/sources that are intended to mislead readers. You may find learning how to spot fake news might improve your media diet.

Why it's bullshit

Their post is based on legitimate concerns from legitimate news sites. There is no FUD here, there is no attack on any "privacy mainstay" unless the moderators believe the US surveillance apparatus needs to be protected by them.

And if we needed more evidence the moderators are protecting the DHS, they also removed this comment from the thread's OP:

DHS revokes legal protections for 532,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans: https://www.npr.org/2025/03/22/nx-s1-5337214/dhs-revokes-humanitarian-parole-cubans-haitians-nicaraguans-venezuelans

Bonus: mods censor a guide to safe border crossing

The post

"How to protect your phone and data privacy at the US border," by Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/mar/26/phone-search-privacy-us-border-immigration .......... To safeguard your phone and data privacy when traveling to the United States, especially if you're a visa or green card holder, prepare for potential device searches by CBP. Decide beforehand if you will comply with a search request, keeping in mind the risks of refusal, such as device confiscation. Turn your phone completely off before entering the United States (to ensure a heightened state of security and to clear the memory) and ensure it requires a strong password for decryption, disabling biometric unlocks. Instead of wiping your phone entirely (which could raise suspicion), selectively delete sensitive data and empty trash folders. Encrypt your device data and consider moving data you don't want searched to a trusted and secure cloud storage, as CBP policy restricts searching online cloud services. Remember that border enforcement can be unpredictable, so these precautions can help minimize risks during inspection.

The removal reason

carrotcypher: Repost as a link post

Why this is bullshit

No rules were broken. Moderator carrotcypher cannot even be assed to fabricate one. (Why not just blacklist The Guardian too?)

[–] LWD@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You said you were done responding, so at least have the dignity of demonstrating a little bit of honesty where it is most apparent.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It seems

Any "privacy" improvements from random instances are not part of the core code structure

The privacy improvements are from the ActivityPub protocol. The author cites them.

Edit: ...and the spammer who keeps copy-pasting the same irrelevant spam from thread to thread is back

[–] LWD@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Don't be a jackass and don't spam.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

The trouble with the thing you quoted twice in a row - unnecessarily padding out your post - is that saying "Mastodon may not be perfect" does not cancel out Pixelfed's massive security issue.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Non-malicious servers aren't supposed to do what Pixelfed did.

 

The IRS rules governing nonprofits still required the Mozilla Foundation to beg big to go big: the parent had to go find big grants from Soros, Ford, Knight, MacArthur, and give smaller grants to many. This put it in the lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply revolving-door personnel sector of NGOs and nonprofits (too many glowies there for me, too). Which meant I had a hostile MoFo over my head the minute I got CEO appointment from the MoCo board...

Of course I can't comment on anything about my exit, for reasons that only the most loopy HN h8ers still can't figure out.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43251203

view more: ‹ prev next ›