Maybe it’s just me, but I’d be embarrassed to have been upset this much over what was clearly a joke. I might not think it’s exceptionally funny either, but I’m at least smart enough to get where it comes from. You however, putting this much effort into trolling someone over it? imho that’s far worse.
Mastengwe
Davel is a massive no life mouthbreathing coward, so… there’s your answer.
That’s exactly what I would expect AI would say.
If you’re doing blanket bans from all AI related slop, can you add me to it as well?
LMAO… I’m “right wing intellect” because I subscribe to the concept of factual relevance over sensationalism and manufactured outrage?
Strange, it’s doesn’t seem very much like “right wing intellectualism” to me, but I’d wager you call everyone something similar if they disagree with you.
Don’t bother responding. I have you blocked.
Yeah… I can’t waste my time with this. It’s gotten absurd, as usual here on lemmy.
So a person is only a murderer if they’re caught?
LMAO. That’s some ‘uncertainty principle’ level of bullshit right there!
Seems to me, following this logic- if you murder someone, you’d want to get caught, seeing as how as long as no one saw you, and to get away with it- your victim is un-murdered because it only happens if it can be proven.
I don’t think you understand how ANY of this works.
Innocent doesn’t mean you did not do a crime. You can’t go murder someone and if a court finds you innocent, if means you never killed anyone.
It means not enough evidence was brought for a hurry to convict you of the crime you ACTUALLY committed.
So when someone say “criminal” it’s safe to assume they mean someone who ACTUALLY COMMITTED A CRIME.
Lastly, I wasn’t talking about Luigi, I was countering a point that someone claimed ALL cops plant evidence which is every bit as untrue as believing that ALL criminals are innocent.
100% agreed!