I don't see that it does that. What do you mean?
MountingSuspicion
joined 2 years ago
Totally agree. They made it sound like it was bringing an important topic into the national conversation and that's the only reason I watched it. I'm very familiar with incel culture and I wanted to know how it dealt with those issues, and honestly, it didn't. It was barely about the main character, much less a character study of a radicalized young boy. 2/4 episodes don't even include him. I don't know why people would watch it, honestly.
Can I ask what context you hear it used in?
Exactly. Though crusades have been broken on launch basically every time, so it's possible he's just trying to be transparent about his war planning capabilities.
3 per year. 10 per lifetime. To my understanding that's been the standard since a limit was introduced.
That part is actually by design. The thought being that if you lose it that it will be more likely to be naturally destroyed than have the time to be found by someone with nefarious aims.
The 10 max rule (which allows for exceptions) was from 2004 when presumably they assumed most people did not have reason to be walking around with theirs all the time. I don't know why it was put in place, other than a cursory search seeming to be antiterrorism bs, but 10 is kinda a lot for a document you generally don't need to carry with you and don't need very often in general. Probably super difficult for people that struggle with housing though.
Thanks for letting me know. I watched that and ended up watching the rest of the video. It was actually a pretty fun watch.
Me when Jews fled Germany. Me when people flee South America. Me when people flee war torn countries. If people (who didn't vote for this) can leave, I hope they do. It hasn't been our country in a long time. Individuals deserve the liberties guaranteed to them by the constitution and if they can no longer find that here and are able to find it elsewhere, they should. There is not enough will here to change things. Throwing yourself at the wall of fascism is a great way to die needlessly. No one should be obligated to die because of the failings of the government they happen to live under. If we had the numbers and could do something, maybe I'd understand your perspective, but we don't have the numbers, and we live in a surveillance state the likes of which history does not have an analogue for. Our government has cameras everywhere and is able to track our every conversation. People here believe this is the will of god. There's no quick fix for that and I don't think people that will be actively hunted down in the meantime have any obligation to stay.
Yea, to my understanding Tesla does not use LiDAR and that's the issue. They just use cameras I think. Other people posted videos in this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJL3htsDyQ
I can't be bothered to care/watch anything Tesla related, but apparently the lack of lidar is the thing being tested.
I hope people stand firm about letting republicans deal with their own issues. I have R family that are not welcome in my home. I have D friends that I would gladly let stay with me. I don't think it'll matter, but no quarter for Rs imho. I'm sure the government will find a way to just keep checks going to people registered R, or open places for them, or force dependent status or something, but no one should open their homes to them. If the government is hostile to me, I can at least make my home hostile to them.
As you note, they've never been good for either the economy or farmers and that hasn't stopped them yet. I fear very little will change.
I'm not familiar with estate law, but seeing as you state your family is living on a trailer on the land, seems like either there'd be an exception (I don't see how having essentially unused rooms on a plot of land would be a problem) or there's some other stuff going on. Maybe if they're not paying into the estate to rent the land that'd be an issue, but I have no idea how that works for land held in an estate. I wonder if 100% tax would incentivize him to sell? One way or the other either he sells or the land is repossessed because presumably the estate would not be able to cover the tax.