Photuris

joined 4 years ago
[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Wow, I didn’t wake up this morning thinking I’d be recruited onto team “Fuck Almonds,” but here we are.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Let’s fucking go.

They made this bed for all of us. Time to sleep in it. We’ve got rice ‘n beans. We can grow potatoes and raise chickens.

If they feel the pain, they may change their ways. If they’re kid-gloved away from the consequences of their own choices, they most certainly will not.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

People don’t “want to work.” They want money. It’s just that working is the easiest way for most people to get that.

Well, thanks Captain Obvious. Statements like that are technically true, but how helpful are they for contributing to a conversation?

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Some people want to rent (e.g., young people, people with mobile jobs, or people who just aren’t ready to be tied down to one place).

And I don’t have a problem with a small-time property owner renting out a house at a fair rate. In theory it’s a win-win: the renter gets a place to stay, the landlord builds equity in their property.

The issue we have is two-fold:

  1. Companies buying up massive amounts of property (not just a house or two, but thousands) and turning entire neighborhoods into rent zones, driving out any competition and availability of housing to buy, thereby driving up prices.

  2. Price collusion amongst these companies, driving up rent far above fair rates, using these software services that share going rates across markets. That reduces consumer choice.

Barring a really interesting solution, like a Land Value Tax or something, my proposal to remediate this housing problem is rather straight-forward and simple:

  1. Prohibit these software companies from sharing rental rates info to customers. Landlords just need to figure it out in their own markets the old fashioned way.

  2. Prohibit corporations from buying housing with the intention to rent it. Force these corporations to sell their housing and get out of the landlord business.

  3. Allow individuals to hold property for renting out, but cap number of properties a person or household can own for the express intention of renting out to five at any given time. That allows a person to build up a nice little savings nest, and provide a rental property to someone who wants to rent, but doesn’t allow anyone to dominate a housing market. Look for those massive profits elsewhere - start a business that creates and provides value.

Anyway, one can dream, I guess.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

And we don’t even use them effectively to protect our rights.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Do not obey in advance.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Cool, I just won’t touch my wife ever again, thanks for the advice.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago

Humble men are preferable to proud boys.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have fond memories of self-hosting a qmail setup for a long time, then eventually migrating to a postfix configuration, back in the day.

Keeping up with spam filtering finally did me in.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Vasalgel is a better, proven, effective, safe, and easily reversible option.

Why hasn’t it been approved yet?

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. He also said he’s “mad at Putin” this week as well.

view more: ‹ prev next ›