SalamenceFury

Here we go again with only caring about mass shootings... Not saying they're not a problem, but at least in the US cops have killed 33x as many people as every mass shooting has done since 1982, but wanting to abolish the police is a non-starter for 90% of libs since they benefit from police violence.

Either way, LLMs are the problem here. There's been five different iterations of every LLM out there and they're still all sycophantic souless text prediction algorithms no matter what. They never challenge the user. They all need to fucking go. People are going into psychosis, committing suicide, and murdering others without a single lawmaker doing anything about those stupid companies who own those chatbots and refuse to take responsibility.

EDIT:

Local police had previously been aware of other worrisome behavior by the perpetrator

Because of course they did. Of fucking course. There has never been a mass shooting anywhere in the entire planet where the fucking PIGS didn't know about the shooter, they always just think "must've been the wind" and make the surprised Pikachu face when it happens.

Nah, I don't think they did. The thing is that nowadays anyone who claims to be an anti-feminist gets instantly clocked as a misogynistic incel, so they hide behind the "protecting women" idea now.

I always thought it was kind of a terrible term even in my early days on the internet, but TERFs would indeed fall under this nowadays. But alas, the only people who used it were angry anti-feminists, so I think it's never going to come back again.

Yeah, if you're in eastern Europe I assume the soviets get all the credit, despite them admitting that without lend lease they wouldn't have won as readily?

Sir comic security man, I think YOU are the one who needs to be pepper sprayed.

No, this is the kimberly-clark fire, this is a reference to that older twitter meme.

If the company was paying this horribly, then maybe it was the better deal for them. Now they can collect unemployment that probably pays more than they did.

The rich forgot that before worker's rights existed, greedy capitalists who owned factories and treated their workers horribly during the industrial revolutions would either find their factories or their homes burnt down, and themselves beaten to death in front of their own families.

Unions and worker's rights were the compromise to avoid this from happening. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and the rich clearly didn't.

Not a Walmart, but a Kimberly-Clark warehouse as others mentioned. This is more making fun of an old tweet of a liberal essentially saying "leftists will say voting doesn't work and to instead firebomb a walmart and then they don't firebomb a walmart", and this meme was about the irony of something symbolically similar happening. And uh, there's been four warehouse fires this week counting this one.

No one wants to hear you trying to shut revolutionary action down before it even begins. Stay in your lane. Workers in the late 19th and early 20th century did this all the time every time the boss got too greedy, if not going to their house and beating them to death in front of their family. Worker's rights only exist because that is the alternative.

This was in Ontario (in Cali), not LA. And either way, I think they'd be fine with higher prices on toilet paper if it means everyone gets paid a living wage.

Correction: The arsonist set some small fires, which triggered the sprinkler systems, which had firefighters come to turn it off and try to prevent water damage.

They then set about 4 bigger fires away from any prying eyes with the sprinklers turned completely off, which spread so fast that the firefighters present declared it a lost cause and called for reinforcements.