IME it's not even a question of forgetting. The so called kill switch doesn't always work, even for an instant. Scary stuff. Luckily you can bind Qbit to your VPN of choice, as you've also done(also qbit?), so that prevents leaks.
On an entirely unrelated note, I don't recommend surfshark. LOL.
But it still really sucks. One small leak and they can tie your IP to everything.
Expecto Transphobia.
Might I just add that nuclear isn't exactly dealing with climate change and water shortages that well.
It's something I never really thought about, but plenty of nuclear plants have faced climate related issues in recent years, and been forced to shutdown or reduce output.
Also, in an age of drone warfare, decentralised power production is potentially also a huge plus.
It's also possible he got sloppy. If you've been doing something for a long time, that can happen. Like forgetting to double check if your vpn is connected for the 10000th time after 10 years of not facing issues.
That and you get cocky, because you've been getting away for it so long, that you think you're unstoppable.
This applies to all repetitive tasks, for example as an experienced driver there comes a point where you get sloppy about checking mirrors, because 99.999% of the time it's ok. And then bam.
As I said above, I'm not arguing anyone should censor what they say, simply think about how they say it.
But your point does deserve to be emphasised.
Agreed.
Of course, being openly critical online without actually doing much else, is also not necessarily particularly productive.
For example, those who openly oppose the Russian government, are often managed or controlled. Whether knowingly or unwittingly, they help further the ruling regime's political aims. Even abroad, supposed enemies of the Kremlin happily advocate the annexation of neighbouring countries or espouse Russian cultural superiority. Their loud pronouncements to the contrary mean nothing.
A lot of of people protesting loudly are doing so to appear as if (or convince themselves) they're doing something.
For example:
going on social media and calling Vladimir Putin names, is far less effective than donating to the Ukrainian army and suggesting others do so too.
complaining about the erosion of freedoms and privacy on a social medium owned by a literal fascist, is far less effective than sharing alternatives to google, inviting them to the fediverse, helping people switch to linux, sharing DIY tips on how to use a buzzsaw or angle grinder, etc.
complaining about capitalism online or watching anti-capitalist tiktoks interspersed with ads, is arguably far less damaging to oligarchy than giving people tips on how to use a VPN or torrent a linux distro.
In any case, as I mentioned in my earlier comment, I was simply referring to my being careful how I say things online, without necessarily censoring what I say. I think it's fair to say we rely far too much on corporate owned and/or surveilled media. Far better to join a local group or organise in your community. There it's far safer to be open than on a public and surveilled internet forum
I get where you're coming from, and that it's no guarantee of safety, but less obvious resistance like malicious compliance, strategic incompetence, 'accidents', and 'everyday resistance' can be a very effective strategy.
As you yourself say, it may change who they go after first, allowing you to fly under the radar longer and fight longer while undetected. Then again, letting people know they're not alone, is also important. So being loud also has its merits.
Of course, I would never be too concrete about all this on the internet, for obvious reasons. I'm also not stopping anyone who wants to take a more brazen route. In some cases, when some campaigns go viral, it has also been effective.
Put simply, there are advantages to appearing unthreatening, stupid, and boring.
This is a bit of a tangent, but I'm quite surprised that people are still prepared to say some things online, given almost everything is likely captured by the (AI based) surveillance panopticon. Everything you say online can and will be used against you and it's honestly best to assume you are not anonymous online. Maybe right now you are, but as the technology evolves, I think it's a fair assumption that plenty will be de-anonymised.
For example, when criticising certain countries, I would personally avoid using any language which can be deliberately misconstrued. To be clear, I'm not arguing that anyone should censor what they say, but I would certainly advise everyone to be careful about how they say it. Eg. death to organisation X, when you can convey the exact same sentiment by saying it should be dismantled, is illegal, etc.
This is not to say we shouldn't still fight or accept that this is now the world works, but simply me saying I have personally decided to be more careful about how I say things, so that I don't make it too easy for the surveillance state. Don't want to get fucked over 10 years down the line. This is why, although I know people find it annoying when people do the tiktok self-censor, I honestly can't entirely blame their clumsy attempts at censorship evasion.
Then again, maybe I'm being naive, and simply posting in some of the same places as people who are more outspoken, will be enough to land me on a list. One silver lining of online age checks; the powers that be are likely to assume that VPN usage is porn related.
So I’m taking precautions and buying from stores that do provide games without DRM.
Same, although I wish I could simply pirate it all.
I already do for some stuff, pop it in sandboxie. But I don't trust that entirely.
Of course, coastal reactors are vulnerable in other ways. Climate change can exacerbate extreme weather events. It's the annoying thing about lots of stuff, you only really find out what goes wrong, when it goes wrong.
Unknown unknowns, as some arsehole once put it.
Also, coal contains small amounts of uranium and thorium which gets concentrated in the fly ash. Fly ash which then gets spread across the area surrounding the power plants. So I'm certainly not saying nuclear is obsolete or particularly dangerous compared to alternatives like coal.