Specter

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Specter@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The “systemd devs” are anyone with the cashe to contribute to it. Yes, you need to be competent dev for your merges to be accepted, unlike in the virus-infested AUR.

But systemd can be forked if you don’t trust said devs. You’d be in the minority though because the majority of distros out there chose to adopt systemd, because it is that good.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Omg shut up. Nobody controls Systemd, it’s open source.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where’s the Spider-man pointing at himself meme?

[–] Specter@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s not per year, it’s per month.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

Wtf $150k a year for a developer is huge. Only in the US, maybe Switzerland, are those wages practiced.

In Europe you’ll get about half of that and that’s still a good wage. I hate the amount of out of touch devs who think getting paid 6-figures is normal.

Well, you see how well that works out, when the session system can’t even sustain itself due to the cost of labour lol.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Same thing with Musk lol failure after failure after failure but there are still clowns on the internet who call him a visionary.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

I might be confusing them with some other distro but I think they outright said they will not comply with any requests for dob verification.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Right.

Not taking a stance is actually taking a stance, as in saying “we will comply as soon as we’re asked to.”

Which is fine to do, I just wish people stopped pretending the mainstream distros are resisting doing something that is clearly unpopular, when in reality they already sided with the law. It’s very different from what AntiX did.

[–] Specter@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nice argument you’re having with yourself there, buddy. Seems like you have quite a lot to pour out.

I don’t have any affinity for China, but I also don’t like the gratuitous hate they get all over the internet, nor the reduction of Chinese people’s experience to work drones (what you’re doing).

I had hoped that Lemmy wasn’t gonna be like that, but alas.

[–] Specter@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Actually it’s the other way around.

The internet is all about “China Bad” so calling it China Battery is a way to depreciate this obviously positive discovery.

view more: next ›