The MIT license is a “libre” license, because it does meet the Free Software Definition.
Nope. It allows someone to use code without sharing the changes of that code. It enables non-free software creators like Microsoft to take the code, use it however they like, and not have to share back. This is what Free Software prevents.
Tired of people calling things like MIT and *BSD true libre/Free Software. They're basically one step away from no license at all.
I've never understood the need for ReVanced because every single application it supports is a horrible pile of trash I'd never install in the first place. So many good alternatives and people would rather patch garbage like Spotify? Why?
So the notification that is in the browser that directs you to update it wasn't enough? Because that totally works with the flatpak version of tor, because all the flatpak version of tor does is download a copy of the browser to your home directory and run it. There's a little notification dot on the hamburger menu of tor that directs you to the about page where you can download and update.
Because that's what I've been doing.
Back in the old days, when a file sharing service got found out by corporations and started sending nasty letters, people stopped using that service.
Too bad the torrenting generation never learned that lesson and now torrenting is just one big clusterfuck of "seekret club" sites and paying (VPNs) to pirate, which is laughable.