Tobberone

joined 2 months ago
[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Depends on what the alternative is. I'd prefer a beer to the water water of Flint i.e.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

As bad as airing out a hot car is, it takes on a different need when its -20C and you need to thaw the car out before going to work in the morning. Much preferable to do that from inside.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 2 points 6 days ago

As bad as things are, I'm still glad that the oil wars are driven by greed and not scarcity. Had the option been mad max things would have been so much more desperate, as things stand, a world with energy and hope is still an option.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not the application im worried about in regards to Jerome Paradox. There are other power guzzling techs that will eat any and all energy that can be produced while paying more per kwh than any of us can afford. Those technologies are my primary concern...

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How on earth did you arrive at that conclusion? You are the one to bring the orange despot into the discussion to begin with.

Why are you so afraid to admit that the country you live in is not best at everything and may actually have something to learn by looking elsewhere? Having a gated pissing contest is not the way we will learn enough fast enough to have a future. Learning from example is the only way forward.

But I'm a bit astounded by this, do you really feel you have to buy a car simply because it is produced? Don't you have any personal efficacy or desires?

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, the new "renewables are bad" talking point. Unlike the general feel of the article I think this is actually just in time. The first TW took 70 years to install, but the second took 2 years (2024). Given 20 years of operational life that means that the quantities starts to accelerate by the end of the 2030-thirties. Which is when the article states that there will be price parity between recycling and landfill...

However, at least here, the cost of landfills has increased and will continue to increase so it quill only be a matter of time...

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

So, westerners want to buy cheap ICE cars and somehow its the fault of the Chinese? As for the Chinese themselves they buy 50+% electric, well ahead of say Sweden.

But as for the topic at hand, surprisingly few people realize how much cheaper renewable are and that they stand to earn a buck adopting green tech while producing less dirty electricity. I have to deal with them at work, sometimes I get to see minds explode in disbelief:)

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Here, maybe. For most outside green energy I expect it to be more newsworthy that 50% of chinas electricity is from renewable and that solar alone eeks out coal. An interesting point about the molten salts approach is that cooldown doesn't happen immediately after sunset. The land use is problematic for most places, though.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I would think that the graph would be rather different had it been "last kilometer"? I'd expect to see electricity at the bottom there.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

For panels mounted as depicted, I'm with you 100%. I do want to mention though that vertically mounted panels seems to increase harvests and from the farmer (singular) I've spoken to who is testing this with the help of academia I've understood that there is a debate about moisture retention. And as far as I've seen, there are more than university coming to the same conclusions. Having said that, we've still to see this tested large scale...

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

I agree, multiple land use is the way forward. Solar panels for their own sake is seldom good enough land use, even if may be cheaper to set up.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 2 points 4 weeks ago

I agree wholeheartedly. Solving the issue of high wintertime electricity use is not about adding capacity, it is about driving down demand. High winter time electricity costs is unfortunate, but it will help making that change. High winter electricity costs will incentivise innovation in energy/heat storage to help reduce electricity needs. And that in turn will help keep electricity costs down for everybody. The municipality im in is currently building 2 heat storage facilities to try the technology. Fingers crossed it will pan out well! For a country like Sweden with approximately 2-2,5 million small houses, if each had a 10MWh heat battery on-prem that'd approximately equal the energy output of all nuclear sites in the country for the sunless 5 months...

view more: next ›