Tobberone

joined 1 year ago
[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago

Although Paris has already reached the milestones mentioned here and then some.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

That's an accurate name for the new toy, but not as fancy as "ai", i guess. Because we know that anything that comes out is gibberish made up to look like something intelligent.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

You mean to say that Facebook isn't the main distraction of the -10s? Before Facebook it was TV that was the circus and low prices and no/hidden VAT provided the bread.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Well, I guess I do a bit of the same:) I do (70+2)(10+3) -> 700+210+20+6

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately i think it's the same old extortion we've seen before. Trump Jr already posted "I wouldn't want to be the last country to cut a deal", so I guess we will see more if this. Ukraine stood up against it, I hope the rest of the world does to, but I'm afraid most wount.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I don't know how we define "enough" in this scenario, but as you allude to: in the end the USA is just some 400 million people buying things from overseas. Absolutely those who buy the most, and that is what drives the economy in many countries. It is what has picked up countries in SE Asia from poverty to industrialization.

Problem is that now when everything is more expensive in the US, the same people will stop spending. They might have spent the same money on products made in America, but those are precious few and just increased in price. So in effect everyone in America can now buy less for the same money and the industry capacity to produce what's demanded doesn't exist in short term. And in real estate, short term is 3-10 years.

The rest of the world? Well, most of the world just lost their biggest market. Of course, the demand that can't be produced domestically in the US will still be seen, but at a reduced rate, which will reduce the economic development world wide, until new markers are found. China still needs to sell, but the market for the high margin stuff is reduced.

In the end? I wouldn't be surprised if this stunt reduces world trade to such a degree it might be viewed as a notable side effect that carbon use went down. Trump might have managed to stop overconsumption like nobody else and with it energy demand. So despite doing the oil industries bidding and go against renewables, the shipping industry stand to loose enough trade that it might affect oil use world wide.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Inflation is defined as the increase of prices over a set period of time. It is in itself nothing, doesn't do anything and its singular purpose is to be able to say how much something costs today compared to yesteryear. If the price difference depends on a supply chock (something that affects the ability to produce, like a shortage), or a demand chock (suddenly everbody rejects Tesla) is all the same, it results in a price change and can therefore be compared using the measure inflation.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

The internet as we know it is dead, we just need a few more years to realise it. And I'm afraid that telecommunications will be going the same way, when no-one can trust that anyone is who they say anymore.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As you have described the situation my question is if it would be similar to copyright Donald duck, despite not having drawn all possible poses and situations?

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. Grok repeatedly generate a set of numbers, which, when keyed against its own list of words, spells out that Musk is spreading misinformation.

It just happens to be frequently...

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I've wanted something like that thumb keyboard since I had my Xperia mini pro in 2010!

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which has yet to be realised. Of it is that fast and easy to set up I'm we will see loads of them going up in notime. Specially now in the US, given how the mindset of the current administration.

Not to mention China which invests heavily in anything able to produce a watt.

Nothing to hinder advancing nuclear in the world's 2 biggest economies! Problem solved.

view more: next ›