WinGirl99

joined 1 month ago
[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

nice booty pal

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I am sad that i was wrong with jaPenis here is an image about to represent how i feel

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

yup commented the details below.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean it is better than not coding at all.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

ichi ni san yon go rokku nana hachi kyuu juu

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice answer and i do really appreciate your answer thanks for your hard work to write it it.

"Human nature" is just a short way of referring to the complex subject of certain behaviors present in some individuals and how they interact with human group dynamics, similarly to how "Theory of Evolution" is a short way of referring to the complex subject of how genetic traits that provide small advantages with reproductive success consequences can through time and the law of large number spread to alter an entire population or even create new species. In fact both those things are correlated.

Evolution has scientific articles behind it. Do you have scientific articles behind your "human nature" claims. Its science's job to analyse "nature". If such phenomena existed there would be articles about it. Please send it.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Interesting take. But there is some truth to the notion of 'human nature'. Humans do act certain ways; we retract from pain, we attempt to solve problems and communicate.

Yes but these are psychological behaviours of humans. Psychology as it is name suggest psycho-logia is a scientific branch. One must speak about that "human nature" if they have scientific data. And instantly that would not be human nature at all because scientific researches have titles like "the change of bird population in cyprus in tha last 50 years" and not "bird nature"\

Whether it is 'human nature' that dictatorship power corrupts people can only be inferred by the examples we have seen. If you can show that a dictatorship didn't lead to abuse of power in some significant number of cases, then it would be proven false.\

It is a generalization not a fact. You cant build up your argument on a generalization and say that it is "human nature". As if humans have evolved by a scientifically approved fact that to do that. While i agree on power corrupts i have awareness of that "if we give one person all the power the probability of it will ruin them is very high. Very bold of someone to label something as "natural".

I am okay with going "statics show that humans are tend to do xyz" I am not okay just saying "human nature"

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 weeks ago

ah yes the good old caste system that makes you post normieslop on your karma farm subreddits.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

are them still down?

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

go back to school

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

oh btw i am an anarchist. Anarchy also is not well with "human nature". So dont think I am a Marxist-leninist and defending them. I just...

...hate that word.

view more: next ›