chrash0

joined 1 year ago
[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Webkit based, for anyone else wondering

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

that’s your definition, sure. outputs absolutely have to be checked or the entire thing is objectively pointless, but it’s not. where you want to draw that line is a semantic argument i’m not interested in. but if you submit shit code to my repos and come to me saying, “oh i was vibe coding”, that’s a paddlin

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i mean, i’ve done it. there’s always some sort of review process. and if the process is just “wrong, do it again” without examining any piece of it, you’re going to have a bad time producing anything of real value anyway

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (6 children)

hell no it’s not. i don’t give a shit how you wrote the code, but i’m not accepting PRs that are shit cuz you used a shit tool to write the code. i’ve already reviewed some goddamn doozies that i’m 99% confident were just “write this for me” and barely reviewed.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

that seems abnormal, but if you’re worried about people creeping into your infra, you could add a VPN for an extra layer of security. i use Tailscale, and it works like a charm

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

ngl, sometimes it is. it depends on the game. usually the problem is anti-cheat, but Valve has been working on improving that with many games working out of the box today. i’d say if you’re playing single player games, once you get Proton installed it’s virtually the same experience.

check out https://www.protondb.com/

if your games are gold or above on there, i’d go ahead and pull the trigger.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

yeah i have friends who are medical technicians, and i’ve heard some things

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

right so we should continue making smart investments in cutting edge tech, which is probably the point they were trying to make, even if the wording of it is informed by a pop culture zeitgeist more than an understanding of the tech and ethics that are currently being scrutinized as part of the development of what is called “AI”

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

i’m definitely not advocating for that. it’s just a bit strange to talk about it like that on a policy level. should the US, as a policy, defund AI research?

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

why focus on the AI boogeyman? investing in AI is important in this context because it has the potential to increase overall productivity. which, like, don’t we see that as a good thing? also, AI might suck right now, but it’s stupid to think that we should just abandon that research. AI is clearly an innovation, and if you don’t think so it’s time to touch grass.

view more: next ›