Larry Fink would be one of them.
cotlovan
I'm talking about present day, not about someone's forefathers. Today people are separated and judged based on their skin color and their preferred sexual partners. If it wasn't right 100 years ago, I don't see how it is OK now.
Why must there be special places, devided by sexual orientation and skin color? Are non-white/non straight people less smart so they need special slots? How is that "equality"?
Also I'm sorry, but as a non native English speaker I fail to understand what you meant by the last paragraphs. Also, I don't know your name and I'm not sure I care.
Bruh, the whole west participated in china's censorship, from Cisco to Siemens. But I guess it's pupular to hate on Zucc now.
Bsky is just Twitter, 10 years ago.
Speaking about false equivalence, how did you came to the conclusion that just because I don't find a corporation removing gender stuff from their policies relevant from a technological stand point - makes me an LGBT hater? You seem to already have made your mind, you probably did assume that I'm a trump supporter who wanna see gays being hanged, even though I was saying that I expected more tech and less gender politics from this sub.
There are a lot of subs dedicated to LGBT, I came here for tech. Which sub would in your opinion be more appropriate for tech talk if not this one?
Of course everyone is allowed to speak their mind. But being called names for not supporting a particular point of view sounds like hate speech to me, wouldn't you agree?
Shiny trends like pride parades, drag shows in schools, rainbow company logos