garbage_world

joined 1 week ago
[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Dear American government, I have a better idea: Ban proprietary software on routers. You can even go a bit further and ban proprietary OSes totally. This way nobody will spy on your citizens without their knowledge.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Is Hamas responsible for everything Israel has done during the current war then?

Surely 2000 people is more valuable than a leader, that was already dying and got replaced in not even 1 week.

Are the illegal immigrants who did bad things responsible for what ICE is doing?

You're responsible for what you do in self defense, if it hurts innocent people.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This sounds reasonable

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26- 051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

This is a poor wording

That law doesn't require to verify the age of the user, it doesn't have to, because it's a law for parents.

What you're saying is exactly slippery slope. You're taking earlier examples of completely different laws, with different purposes and mechanisms, and you make your argument based on how the implementation of those laws worked.

Occam's razor explanation of DMCA 1201: The law makers wanted to foolproof the law and implemented security measures that weren't needed.

Also THE only argument you have for the fact thisaw is going to be changed is the law that changed (even if only temporarily) IN A GOOD DIRECTION!

You really made me laugh.

Who is pushing for this?

I want to know that too.

I know meta lobbied for app store accountability act or smth, I don't remember it's name. They didn't do that to spy on people, but because they wanted to shift the blame.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is a law FOR PARENTS.

It's not a law for children, it doesn't target to protect children from up, but to give parents the tools to set the age of the kids themselves.

Do you have any proof that those systems were created for control? You sure have if you express your opinions with such confidence.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

But they did what the laws (Californian, Colorado's and basically every other, except for the New York's and Texan) required them to do.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only penalty in this law is for OS makers that didn't include such rules in the OS, paying per affected child.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Marie WHAT?

Maria Skłodowska-Curie

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Slippery slope again

view more: next ›