gazter

Ok I'll take this as my opportunity to rant about a pet peeve.

Wearing a harness in this style of elevating work platform is more dangerous than not wearing one, and having a requirement to do so is part of what's wrong with work health and safety.

The only way someone falls out of this, beyond mechanical failure or tipping, is if they lean so far over the railing they fall out of it.

If I need to wear a harness in this, you need to wear one whenever you walk next to a balcony.

The router is set as a subnet router, that is how I am able to access other machines on my lan remotely.

I don't want to, and sometimes can't, install tailscale on every device I want remote access to.

So I may have duplicate routes- Does that explain the behaviour in my original post? And how would I go about avoiding that?

I could turn off subnet routing, and only turn it on when needed, but I'll be putting up a bunch of other services that will want to talk to each other- I'm assuming this will break whenever I turn subnet routing on.

I kind of follow what you're putting down.

I am not using an exit node. How do I go about splitting my routes?

What I want to achieve is 'normal' access for within the lan, as well as remote access over tailscale for things I cannot run tailscale on.

I have a commercial VPN, but I am not connected. What tinkering did you have to do?

I set up subnet advertisements by doing tailscale set --advertise-routes=192.168.1.0/24. I did not touch ACL.

The home PC is Windows, the context menu for the tray app give the option to 'use tailscale subnets' which is enabled- I assume this is the equivalent of accepting advertised routes.

From the home PC, tailscale ping 192.168.1.2 returns a pong, from the tailscale IP. tracert fails.

Linux newb here. What does this mean? My knowledge of systemd is that it is responsible for things like mounting disks and running networking. So does this mean I can ask systemd to grab a new IP address every x hours, even if the machine is asleep?

You've got a shelf full of fifty boxes. Forty five of them are sold. You've got five people working in the store across three registers. You want to make sure that the people who ordered one get one, so you pre-allocate them by printing out all the orders and attaching them to the box.

I don't understand. This isn't really a subject I care much about, so forgive my ignorance.

Are you saying that an AI generated frame would be closer to the actual rendered image than if the image rendered natively? Isn't that an oxymoron? How can a guess at what the frame will be be more 'accurate' than what the frame would actually be?

I was a little sad when I heard about it, as well as bittersweet while reading The Shepherd's crown. Then I closed the book, curled up in bed and wept myself to sleep.

I've found joy in passing his name on to the next generation.

Have you read Shaking Hands with Death? It's... cathartic.

The cheaper ones are generally pretty finicky, and often introduce weird compression. You'll often find the stated achievable distances to require very good cabling with very good terminations.

If using cat cable was a necessity, I'd put the extra money down and get HDbaseT units. But I'd be pretty seriously looking into the various fully moulded active HDMI cables or even better, SDI solutions.

It's a thing, but it's either cheap and really sucks, or expensive and kind of sucks.

Are you from the future?