hatingfedizen

joined 4 months ago
 

Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20260709110544/https://www.irishtimes.com/world/europe/2026/07/08/ai-software-that-generates-rage-bait-developed-by-germanys-far-right-afd/

The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has developed a new software suite, driven by Google Gemini, Open AI and Anthropic’s Claude, that helps party members generate so-called “rage bait” social media postings.

Central to the new campaign is the Alternita platform, registered to the AfD’s general secretary Hans-Holger Malcomeß, which promises users social media posts “in five minutes, with your positions, in your style, your branding”.

In the case of the AfD, an undercover investigation by Germany’s Correctiv outlet revealed how, in a few clicks, a populist article can be turned into provocative posts to flood social media feeds.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/71975475

Today, the European Parliament allowed the suspicionless mass scanning of private communications (“Chat Control 1.0”) to pass, a measure it had rejected twice in March. Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes. As a result, mass scanning is now permitted again until 2028.

 

Today, the European Parliament allowed the suspicionless mass scanning of private communications (“Chat Control 1.0”) to pass, a measure it had rejected twice in March. Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes. As a result, mass scanning is now permitted again until 2028.

 

Samsung announced stellar results last night, noting a 19x quarterly increase in operating profit, allowing the firm to pass Nvidia as the most profitable in the world. Kim Yong-Kwan, president and head of corporate management, strategy, and operations for Samsung Electronics' Device Solutions (DS) division, said that the semiconductor unit's 2026 operating profit will exceed everything it has earned across roughly 40 years in the chip business.

Brokerage consensus puts Samsung's full-year 2026 operating profit near 300 trillion won ($196 billion), and its second-quarter figure at about 84.6 trillion won ($55.1 billion). Samsung easily beat the consensus with $58.5 billion when it posted preliminary results on July 7, overtaking Nvidia's most recent quarterly operating profit of $53.54 billion and becoming the most profitable technology company in the world for the period, on the back of AI-driven memory demand.

Samsung's DS division booked 53.7 trillion won ($35.1 billion) of the company's 57.2 trillion won in total operating profit during the first quarter of 2026, roughly 94% of the total, which is why the division's projection sits so close to Samsung's full-year consensus.

"This year's profit will exceed the cumulative profit generated over the past 40 years since we entered the semiconductor business," Kim Yong-Kwan told staff, scoping the claim to the chip business rather than the wider conglomerate.

Samsung entered the semi space by acquiring Korea Semiconductor in 1974 and shipped its first 64Kb DRAM in the mid-1980s. SamMobile estimates the division's cumulative operating profit from 1985 to 2025 at under 300 trillion won. Samsung's smartphone, display, and appliance businesses have earned far more than that over the same period, so the record applies to memory and logic chips, not to Samsung overall.

Contract prices for DRAM and NAND have risen steeply through 2026 as AI server demand outran supply, pushing memory makers toward 40% to 50% operating margins on NAND in the first half of the year. Prices for 12 GB LPDDR5X modules have reached about $145, and Samsung is negotiating further commodity DRAM increases for the third quarter. The DS division's earnings move with those contract prices, and Samsung has told customers to expect tight supply through at least 2027.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The shady way they are proceeding with this policy stinks so rotten.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/71801056

En France, le gouvernement s’apprête à faire passer une nouvelle loi qui présumerait légal tout tir de policier ou gendarme. Le texte sur la « présomption de légitime défense pour les forces de l’ordre » sera débattu à l’Assemblée nationale le 7 juillet. S’il est voté, il s’agirait d’une bascule historique qui offrirait aux forces de l’ordre un « permis de tuer ». Nous nous opposons fermement à ce projet de loi, voici pourquoi.

Cette nouvelle proposition de loi s’appuie sur une législation plus ancienne adoptée en 2017 connu sous le nom de l’article L.435-1 du Code de la sécurité intérieure. Derrière ce nom abstrait, se cache en réalité un changement majeur : la loi vient élargir les conditions dans lesquelles les forces de l’ordre peuvent utiliser leurs armes. Concrètement, un policier ou un gendarme peut ouvrir le feu sur une personne qu’il pense « susceptible » de représenter un danger. Or, depuis son adoption, les tirs mortels de policiers sur des véhicules ont été cinq fois plus nombreux qu’avant 2017.

C’est dans ce contexte déjà alarmant que la nouvelle proposition de loi s’inscrit. Plutôt que de corriger les failles de la loi de 2017, la nouvelle loi soutenue par le gouvernement les aggrave. Jusqu’ici, en cas de tir, une enquête doit vérifier si les conditions exigées par l’article L.435-1 sont bien réunies. Avec la nouvelle loi, cette vérification ne serait même plus nécessaire : à chaque fois qu’un policier utilisera son arme, le tir sera automatiquement considéré comme légal.

 

In France, the government is preparing to pass a new law that would presume any shooting by a police officer or gendarme to be lawful. The bill on “presumption of self-defense for law enforcement” will be debated in the National Assembly on July 7. If passed, it would mark a historic shift that would effectively grant law enforcement a “license to kill.”

This new bill is based on an older piece of legislation passed in 2017, known as Article L.435-1 of the Internal Security Code. Behind this abstract name lies a major change: the law broadens the circumstances under which law enforcement officers may use their weapons. Specifically, a police officer or gendarme may open fire on a person whom they believe is “likely” to pose a danger. However, since its adoption, the number of fatal shootings by police targeting vehicles has been five times higher than before 2017.

It is against this already alarming backdrop that the new bill is being proposed. Rather than addressing the flaws in the 2017 law, the new bill supported by the government exacerbates them. Until now, whenever a police officer fired a weapon, an investigation was required to verify whether the conditions set forth in Article L.435-1 had been met. Under the new law, this verification would no longer even be necessary: whenever a police officer uses their weapon, the use of force would automatically be considered lawful.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/71358539

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress/comments/1ugpyoe/i_dug_around_a_bit_and_found_exactly_who_is/

I dug around a bit and found exactly who is responsible for the new EU 3/5 Euros customs fees, here is who they are and how to hit back at them.

I dug around a bit in the public paper trail to find out exactly bought and paid for this law to screw over everyday consumers. The answer boils down to greedy monopolies with political connections being afraid of real competition because efficiency and a superior business model are apparently "unfair"

The corpos behind the mask.

The main driving force that pressured the European Commission to kill the de minimis threshold and forced you to pay 3 euros for a 2 euro pack of double adhesive stickers is a massive monopolistic corporate lobby group in Brussels called EuroCommerce.

They ran an aggressive, well funded lobbying campaign called the #Compliance4All. They did this because they were absolutely terrified of people buying affordable directly from global sellers instead of paying their bloated monopoly markups.

When you look at who actually sits on the governing body for this lobby, you find Europe's biggest retail and grocery monopolies pulling the strings. According to their official website, this nasty group is packed with corporate lobbyists, including:

Parent Corporate Member Key Retail Brands & Subsidiaries Annual Revenue
Schwarz Group Lidl, Kaufland, PreZero €185.6 Billion
REWE Group BILLA, REWE, Penny, Toom Baumarkt, BIPA €100.4 Billion
Ahold Delhaize Albert Heijn, Delhaize, Alfa Beta, Mega Image, Maxi, Albert €92.35 Billion
Carrefour Group Carrefour, Carrefour Market, Express, Atacadão, Cora, Match €91.48 Billion
Tesco PLC Tesco, Tesco Express, One Stop €82 Billion
Inditex Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius €36 Billion
H&M Group H&M, COS, Monki, Weekday, & Other Stories, ARKET €21 Billion
Colruyt Group Colruyt, Okay, Spar €11.19 Billion

They successfully convinced the EU to pass this law to bully us back into their stores and buy their heavily marked up crap. This is classic protectionist crony capitalism.

How We can legally fight back:

Don't let them force you back into their overpriced supermarkets and clothing stores. And share this with your friends. Use filters in the AliExpress app to buy products that are being shipped from Europe, and the Choice Category stacking mechanism thus skipping or reducing the fees.

Get together with some friends and buy stuff you like together preferably via the Choice option, making sure it is in the same category, then have one of you purchase it and distribute it to the others. You can even use cheap courier services that might cost less than the per item handling fee if you live far apart.

since: Boycott the likes of Schwartz and Zara and buy from local stores. Buy from local stores. Going to small so called "Mom-and-pop" stores for necessities keeps the money in your local community and puts it in your neighbors pockets, not those of some greedy corporation that does everything it can to skip taxes and stifle real competition.

Demand that these monopolies be hit with extra taxes, since many of them like Schwarz already have bad reputations for unfair competition and many national level politicians in the EU want to hit THEM with extra taxes you can support whoever wants to put such a law in place. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, so make sure you spread this message far and wide!

Related: EU ministers agree customs fee to crack down on parcels from Chinese companies such as Shein and Temu

 

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress/comments/1ugpyoe/i_dug_around_a_bit_and_found_exactly_who_is/

I dug around a bit and found exactly who is responsible for the new EU 3/5 Euros customs fees, here is who they are and how to hit back at them.

I dug around a bit in the public paper trail to find out exactly bought and paid for this law to screw over everyday consumers. The answer boils down to greedy monopolies with political connections being afraid of real competition because efficiency and a superior business model are apparently "unfair"

The corpos behind the mask.

The main driving force that pressured the European Commission to kill the de minimis threshold and forced you to pay 3 euros for a 2 euro pack of double adhesive stickers is a massive monopolistic corporate lobby group in Brussels called EuroCommerce.

They ran an aggressive, well funded lobbying campaign called the #Compliance4All. They did this because they were absolutely terrified of people buying affordable directly from global sellers instead of paying their bloated monopoly markups.

When you look at who actually sits on the governing body for this lobby, you find Europe's biggest retail and grocery monopolies pulling the strings. According to their official website, this nasty group is packed with corporate lobbyists, including:

Parent Corporate Member Key Retail Brands & Subsidiaries Annual Revenue
Schwarz Group Lidl, Kaufland, PreZero €185.6 Billion
REWE Group BILLA, REWE, Penny, Toom Baumarkt, BIPA €100.4 Billion
Ahold Delhaize Albert Heijn, Delhaize, Alfa Beta, Mega Image, Maxi, Albert €92.35 Billion
Carrefour Group Carrefour, Carrefour Market, Express, Atacadão, Cora, Match €91.48 Billion
Tesco PLC Tesco, Tesco Express, One Stop €82 Billion
Inditex Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius €36 Billion
H&M Group H&M, COS, Monki, Weekday, & Other Stories, ARKET €21 Billion
Colruyt Group Colruyt, Okay, Spar €11.19 Billion

They successfully convinced the EU to pass this law to bully us back into their stores and buy their heavily marked up crap. This is classic protectionist crony capitalism.

How We can legally fight back:

Don't let them force you back into their overpriced supermarkets and clothing stores. And share this with your friends. Use filters in the AliExpress app to buy products that are being shipped from Europe, and the Choice Category stacking mechanism thus skipping or reducing the fees.

Get together with some friends and buy stuff you like together preferably via the Choice option, making sure it is in the same category, then have one of you purchase it and distribute it to the others. You can even use cheap courier services that might cost less than the per item handling fee if you live far apart.

since: Boycott the likes of Schwartz and Zara and buy from local stores. Buy from local stores. Going to small so called "Mom-and-pop" stores for necessities keeps the money in your local community and puts it in your neighbors pockets, not those of some greedy corporation that does everything it can to skip taxes and stifle real competition.

Demand that these monopolies be hit with extra taxes, since many of them like Schwarz already have bad reputations for unfair competition and many national level politicians in the EU want to hit THEM with extra taxes you can support whoever wants to put such a law in place. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, so make sure you spread this message far and wide!

Related: EU ministers agree customs fee to crack down on parcels from Chinese companies such as Shein and Temu

 

From Wikipedia:

The Hannibal Directive is the name of a controversial procedure used by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. Author Eyal Weizman has described a 2014 Israeli policy stating that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces." It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/suppressed_news/comments/1uh9aex/footage_of_israeli_forces_confirming_the_hannibal/

 

On 18 June 2026, militants attacked the Diori Hamani International Airport in Niamey, Niger, killing 13 people and injuring 4 others; 22 attackers were also killed.

According to Radio France Internationale, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), in a brief statement published through its usual propaganda channel, Az-Zallaqa, claimed to have carried out “a suicide attack on Diori Hamani International Airport and the nearby military base.”

The Minister of Defence accused, without providing evidence, its former colonial power, France, of being behind the attack.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

These people boast about EU being a democratic heaven whenever they get criticized for their complicity with crimes against humanity. Then they fuck every democratic principle and mechanism to do whatever their lobbyist ask them to do.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

EU continues their campaign of using fear-mongering tactics against China while they keep business as usual with the genocidal entity, truly despicable.

 

Original Title: EU moves to ban high-risk inverters from China over cybersecurity threats

The EC will eliminate the use of Chinese-made inverters in EU-funded energy projects with the aim of protecting critical energy infrastructure from possible cyber threats that could trigger power outages.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So you are equaling being pro-Hamas to procuring weapons to a genocidal entity?? hmmm

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'm of the opinion that they did nothing wrong and the trial itself is criminal to begin with. I still don't understand their or your comment, what's at the bottom of the slope?

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

what does this even mean? The German judicial system is putting obstacles to have a fair trail against people doing their best to boycott a genocide and this is what you have to say about it?

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I'm reading a lot of "no progress at all" headlines by many analist: Magyar's party is a spin-off Orban's, they are still is pro-zionist, pro-war, right-leaning party with no regard for the rights of feminists or the LGBTI community. The only interesting "change" is that it aligns with Von Der Leyen-Kallas views, and thats why mainstream media is foaming at the mouth with it.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

It's a recent item, maybe it gets translated later?

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes that was my confusion, that's also why not all countries are present in this vote. The original post is trying to raise attention because the vote for the Chat Control 2.0 is starting these days.

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

My bad, I thought I had included the link to the original post when I uploaded the image

[–] hatingfedizen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago

According to this other post by Tuta:

Final negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 just started between the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU. What is good: ✅️ Encryption will not be broken What is bad: ❌️ Commission & Council want #IDchecks

view more: next ›