lemmeBe

It's an issue according to any UX pattern. If something says that it's done when it's not, it's misrepresentating the state of the action.

Hard to believe that modifying the counter to include the necessary time for actual writing to the flash drive would break everything. Target flash drives only etc.

System functioning as intended doesn't mean that it's a good UX.

Thanks! I'll try that out today!

Why quotation marks? Issue is an issue, decades or days old. 😄

Copying mechanism itself isn't an issue here; false reporting that something is done when it's not is.

Thanks for the info.

I tried installing PCManFM-Qt and deleting from there. Works as you'd expect, deletes instantly.

Having NOxOn@lemmy.ml insight in mind that it's a decades long issue, I don't get how come that some of us are affected by it and some aren't. 😅

Been using Tumbleweed as well. May I ask if you encountered these 2 issues:

1. Copy 1Gb movie to flash drive, says it's done in 10 seconds. Try to remove the flash drive, still in use. Turns out it's actually still copying.
2. Send some files, whatever the size, even 10Mb, to the trash and it takes a minute per file.

Stumbled upon some github issues saying that it's a longstanding problem (since 2009 even), but I can't believe that people put up with it for so long without fixing it.

I'm not even thinking of changing DE but this is annoying to say the least.

Discovered Veronica recently... ❤

It's more probable people buying cheaper and then installing Windows afterwards - a lot more probable than starting their tech life from scratch.

Tried using public instances, but 1/3 searches was failing. Found it unusable. That was like a year ago when I was looking for DDG alternatives.

Then I was obviously checking it a bit before that. Thanks for the update!

Well said.

Seems that 2 of those entitled ones are following you on Lemmy. 😄

Same impression that I got and therefore decided to skip it.

Here are my Filen testing notes from a couple of months ago. It's a habit of mine so I don't forget why I discarded some options.

• It's impossible to upload anything through the Win app. You can only set up sync folders where you need to place files. Through the web app, however, you can upload both folders and files.
• The desktop app disappears as soon as you switch to another app, and you have to launch it again by clicking on the shortcut.
• You can't access data in the cloud via a virtual drive or anything similar.
• In short, it's unusable for my use case.

Edit: Be aware that according to Matt@lemdro.id, the above issues have been rectified in the meantime, so you should give it a go before deciding.

Hopefully, I can shed some light because I'm in the process of looking for a new email provider so I've been researching extensively for the past few days.

Firstly, despite their strong marketing about privacy and encryption, ALL the privacy-focused email providers face the same fundamental limitation when it comes to incoming emails from external sources:

• They can read incoming external emails upon arrival.
• They process these emails (for spam filtering, etc.) before encryption.
• Only after this processing do they encrypt the emails for storage.

It's a limitation inherent to the current email infrastructure and affects virtually all email providers as far as I'm aware.

So, marketing claims about "zero-access encryption" often refer to emails at rest (in storage), not during transit or initial processing. For truly private communication, end-to-end encryption (like PGP) needs to be implemented by the sender before the email reaches any server.

That being said, Mailbox provides E2E encryption through standard PGP and S/MIME protocols, allowing users to encrypt both incoming and outgoing emails with their own encryption keys that can be generated or imported into the system. Beyond email encryption, they implement domain security and server-side encryption of all stored data, with the option to create secure aliases that only communicate over encrypted connections.

For Mailbox users communicating with other Mailbox users, there isn't an automatic E2E system in place by default (like Proton has). Doesn't matter to me because very little people I communicate with use Mailbox (it's currently the same situation with Proton for me).

You could register anonymously, use a VPN, and encrypt your messages with PGP and be safe that way. I, however, consider emails inherently unsafe means of communication and use them for registrations and meaningless communication only.

Also, Mailbox has Guard feature that creates a temporary mailbox for recipients without PGP. The recipient receives two emails - one with a link to the temporary mailbox and another with the password. You can also add an additional PIN for extra security that you communicate through another channel.

P. S. Their servers are powered by 100% renewable energy, if that carries any weight.