phar

I think they mean this one but the guy is obviously not in enough danger to start blasting.

https://youtu.be/ZrUMVtrCK_Y

Edit: slow the video down a bunch, I don't think the vehicle actually starts to accelerate much until after he shoots her.

I remember my corded kitchen phone and newspapers

I mean...that's why that movie was made to begin with...

https://www.npr.org/2026/01/03/nx-s1-5665695/maduro-trump-drug-dealer-pardons

Yea, that is actually not a good analogy...

I guess I meant more than just bug reports or ineffective coding. Like get involved with the project. But I guess I also don't know how the project is run.

That article applies to very few people. I do wonder if since this person has some disability that requires this orca program, maybe they could contribute and help? Just a thought.

It took me a second too. I don't think I've ever seen him smiling before. He always looks like he's about to murder people

Wow, all I did was make coffee

I recommend you actually look up statistical relevance And what that means Compared to proof

So no other peer reviewed studies then? You're a one article is absolute kind of guy? Good luck out there.

Likewise 30,000 people out of 1.3 billion is not going to be representative. Again do you have any other peer-reviewed studies or are you just basing your entire beliefs of one small sample study?