raze2012

joined 3 years ago
[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Grok will do a lot of things that Claude or gemini or OpenAI will refuse to do for you (at least without a lot of prodding)

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Education can't fix apathy. I don't know what can, to be honest. Community, perhaps.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slop implies bare bones, generic, repetitive design, and thrown together quick. Say what you want about Zelda, but it has never been any of those.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

some of, to the flat out worst, in their respective series.

TOTK/BOTW

Look mate, not everything you don’t personally like is “slop”.

And your other cases are pokemon (who's been accused of sinking since the 3DS days) and Smash's online. Not even the game, its netcode (which if we're being real is bad for 99% of Nintendo games). We don't need to invent reasons to hate Nintendo, okay.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Say it with me now: "The cruelty is the point"

Or I guess, "was" in this case.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah, at that point you just gotta sell it off. Hell, sell it off half price and you still get life changing money.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The falsehood was that the election was lost because a large number of people decided “both sides are the same.” That is a comforting lie.

I never said that. I'm talking about people still trying to set the fence 20 months after the results of the election. 2024 has come and gone and there's not much use deliberating over why or how she lost. Because I think what's happening in 2025 onward will affect elections much more than re-living 2024. Trying to argue "Kamala said that" as if she's wrong because she lost doesn't help your argument (especially when many of her predictions came true anyway).

So yeah, if you're in 2026 still arguing "both sides are the same", you picked your side.

Some people just have different ethical systems than you do.

This isn't ethical, this is simple fact checking. You're reading way too deeply into a comment that was simply doing fact checking, and not even making a political judgment call.

It appears you prefer feeling morally superior over actually winning elections

This isn't political, this is simple fact checking. You're reading way too deeply into a comment that was simply doing fact checking. Let's go back over the chain and see what I said:

  1. Everything Kamala said turned out to be true (yes, I'm exaggerating. But the big predictions are turning out true)
  2. I’m tired of being gaslit by people who want to pretend they are enlightened centrists (this is a subjective call, but not tied to any particular political party. this can apply to Trump, Bush, Kamala, or Epstein)
  3. Be much better if people could be the bigger person, admit “yeah this was worse than I ever expected” (a call to action to centrists or right wing people who have soured on Trump[). This is a bit more political because it's targeted at Trump's policies, but ultimately is trying to make those with voter regret honest. If you have no regrets and think Trump is doing a good job, you would never say "this is worse than I expected")

That's all I'm saying. I also literally said "I'm not here to gloat, I want problems fixed", so thanks for ignoring that.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Slander implies falsehood. I've said nothing false. I'm tired of being gaslit by people who want to pretend they are enlightened centrists just because they are now feeling the consequences of their actions but still can't bring themselves to say "the other side was right".

Be much better if people could be the bigger person, admit "yeah this was worse than I ever expected" and learn from their mistakes. I don't want to gloat or celebrate or anything, I just want to fix the damn broken windows. It's honestly more annoying to have people say "there's no difference between a broken/fixed window" than it is people who say "what? the window isn't broken"

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, even for adults I feel this borders way too close on deepfakes. We needed to ban those years ago. I simply do not see any artistic nor educational context to justify nudifying someone without consent.

And this isn't unheard of, even in America. Even with caricatures you can wander close to libel if you're drawing someone like that .

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Elon's under the most scrutiny because Grok is the least restricted LLM. Of course om reasonably worried that they are blocking this for less savory reasons.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Why not make PC manufacturers responsible for crimes committed on the computer?

Wrong example. This is more like YouTube being responsible for hosting CSAM that gets uploaded to them. We do in fact hold then accountable.

The implication here is that AI gets trained on CSAM to perform such tasks and that's probably a line we need to draw immediately before this gets out of hand.

there are open source stable diffusion AI models already that you can train to generate this stuff locally, on your own PC

And you train it on what, Mr Epstein? 🤨

view more: next ›