Economics

1961 readers
24 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 
2
3
4
5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28009715

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Shereen Bhan joins Jeffrey D. Sachs, renowned Economics professor and bestselling author, to discuss the biggest headlines shaping the world today. From escalating US-China tensions to the economic implications, they dive into the complexities of the global landscape.

#risingbharatsummit #Tarrifs #Trump #USA #jeffreysachs #risingbharatsummit2025 #viksitbharat2047 #cnbctv18 #businessnews #businessnewstoday #businessnewsinenglish


Main Topic:

The video features an interview with economist Jeffrey Sachs, who discusses his concerns about President Trump's tariff policies and their potential to wreck the world economy.

Key Points:

  • Trump's Policies are Destructive: Sachs argues that Trump's tariff policies are reminiscent of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s and the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008, both of which led to global economic crises. He believes Trump is single-handedly damaging the world economy.
  • Impact on the US Economy: Sachs suggests that the US is likely headed for a recession, potentially in 2025, due to declining consumer sentiment and disrupted supply chains.
  • China's Response: Sachs anticipates that China will continue to reduce its holdings of US dollar assets and promote alternative payment systems through BRICS. He believes China will not be bullied and will take a more leadership role on the international stage.
  • End of American Leadership: Sachs argues that Trump's policies mark the end of American leadership and the perception of the US as a global stabilizer.
  • India's Position: Sachs advises India not to be played by the US or fall into an anti-China stance. He emphasizes the importance of normal relations between India and China and suggests India should focus on multilateral trade arrangements.
  • Trump's Authority: Sachs criticizes Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, calling it unconstitutional and reckless. He also criticizes the corruption of the US political system.
  • Congress's Role: Sachs expresses disappointment in Congress's failure to check Trump's power, but suggests that pressure from donors or court challenges could potentially provide a check.

Highlights:

  • Sachs repeatedly emphasizes the severity of the situation, using strong language to describe Trump's policies as "wrecking the world economy."
  • He highlights the potential for a US recession and the disruption of global supply chains.
  • He warns India against aligning too closely with the US at the expense of its relationship with China.
  • He criticizes the US political system as corrupt and Congress as a "doormat."
  • He describes Trump's actions as "illegal" and "unconstitutional."

About Channel:

About CNBC-TV18: India's leading business news channel, CNBC-TV18 offers the most comprehensive coverage of businesses, the economy and the financial markets. Catch all your favourite shows, exclusive videos, big-ticket interviews and more here.

6
7
8
9
10
 
 

There's a metal bezel mod that I have on my casio watch that I got from china for $10, I would rather spend more money if it was made in a place with fair practices but it doesn't exist anywhere except aliexpress. There are a bunch of other items stuff like screen protectors and electronics that aren't made in the US for consumers to buy and that's a damn shame.

My point is, the tariffs are supposed to get us to manufacture more stuff in house and be more independent but I don't think it will work. If you look at China's playbook, they didn't impose massive tariffs on the world but still managed to be a global manufacturing warehouse out if nothing. China pretty much just subsidizes a bunch of their companies and gives them major tax breaks, along with giving them money if they sell internationally.

If the orange rapist wants to do this, then why doesn't he just copy the same thing, give incentives to manufacture goods instead of punishing consumers? The reason people aren't buying in house, is because we don't make anything in house.

11
12
13
14
15
 
 

Alternative link

Looking at the unintended consequences of tariffs and found this little tidbit.

Tariffs have long been a contentious tool of economic policy in the United States. Proponents argue they shield domestic industries from foreign competition, enabling growth and job creation. Yet, the historical record, as illuminated by scholars like Douglas Irwin in his study “Tariffs and Growth in Late Nineteenth Century America,” demonstrates that tariffs often hinder economic progress more than they help.

During the late nineteenth century, the United States maintained some of the highest tariff rates in its history. While this period coincided with rapid industrial growth, Irwin argues that tariffs were not the primary driver of economic expansion. Instead, technological innovation, abundant natural resources, and a growing domestic market played far more significant roles. High tariffs distorted resource allocation, favoring inefficient industries over more competitive sectors. This misallocation led to higher consumer prices and suppressed overall economic welfare.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
 
 

Trump's 34% tariff gambit against China is the latest convulsion of a capitalist system in decay. For four decades, neoliberal orthodoxy gutted the US industrial base, outsourcing production to low-wage markets to maximize shareholder profits. The result is a financialized economy where Wall Street thrives while the real economy lies in ruins. Tariffs, sold as economic populism, are a naive attempt to reindustrialize the economy. However, this policy cannot work without massive public investment in factories, worker training, or supply chain sovereignty. All the tariffs can accomplish is to inflate consumer prices while enriching the same oligarchs who lobbied for outsourcing. The US now finds itself in a middle of a massive contradiction: protectionism requires a productive base, yet capitalists long ago abandoned production for speculation.

The US corporate aristocracy, living off cheap overseas labor and deregulated profit extraction, rejects the long-term industrial policy needed to revive manufacturing. Why? Because reinvesting in domestic production would require taxing capital, regulating markets, and empowering labor. All such policies would be anathema to the billionaire class. Meanwhile, the working majority, promised a renaissance of industrial dignity, will only see higher prices and stagnant wages. What we're really seeing here is class struggle masked as trade policy.

China's calculated response of export controls on key rare earth along with the reciprocal 34% tariffs reveals a strategic depth absent in the US. China is able to seamlessly coordinate industrial policy, resource control, and geopolitical aims. China made massive investments into making itself an essential global producer of rare earths which are vital for semiconductors, weapons, and green tech. Now, China is able to weaponize the very supply chains that western capitalism outsourced. Where the US sees trade as a ledger of deficits, China sees it as a battlefield of material dependencies.

The most likely outcome of the tariff war will be further erosion of dollar hegemony. The US pushes nations to look for alternatives by weaponizing the dollar and extracting seigniorage. At the same time, China's BRICS+ alliances and Belt and Road infrastructure offer a pragmatic path forward for countries that wish to retain their sovereignty.

The trade war is a symptom of capitalism's systemic crisis. As the multipolar world emerges, western workers will bear the brunt of new economic realities unless they are able to seize the means of production. The tariffs are mere tremors, the earthquake will come when labor finally rejects the logic of capital altogether.

view more: next ›