this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
93 points (87.8% liked)
[Closed] Moved to !harrypotter@literature.cafe
974 readers
1 users here now
Moved to !harrypotter@literature.cafe
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not the transphobic billionaire, that's for damn sure.
So who is it, do you estimate, that is campaigning so hard against a women's rights organization?
Think about who's interests these sorts of campaigns serve.
I think you need to reevaluate your position. Chalking this up to "women's rights" is disingenuous at best.
Rowling is lobbying to exclude trans women from being legally recognized as women. You're free to pick a side there, and I'm free to call you a transphobe if you agree with her.
What cis woman is hurt by a trans woman being legally recognized as a woman?
"Women's rights"? So they protect trans women too, right?
When you have to use veiled hints instead of clearly stating your point, you either know you're wrong or you're ashamed of your belief.
They are an anti-women’s right organisation. Trans women are women.
They don’t need vested interests to campaign against them.
which womens rights organization? because this article is about JKR specifically