this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
136 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

25594 readers
1348 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)
    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    This is a command that throws a permission denied error while trying to create a symlink to a file that almost certainly does not exist.

    It's like someone turning to you and saying "Knick knack!" then waiting for you to ask "who's there?"

    [–] jim3692@discuss.online 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

    In bash, when you redirect the output of a command to /dev/null, like cat /etc/passwd >/dev/null, you are silencing the output.

    There are cases that this is useful, for example when checking if an application is installed:

    node -v >/dev/null && echo "Node.js is installed"

    This line tries to get the version of Node.js, but it silences the output. That's because we don't care about the version. We only care about whether the execution was successful, which implies the existence of Node.js in the system.

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

    Dear linux newbies of the fediverse:

    Please do not run cat for the sole purpose of copying a single files content to STDOUT

    Your system almost certainly has a pager on it (e.g. 'less', 'more', 'most'). Your pager likely has an option like the -F option of less, which will not paginate the file if your terminal has the space to display it all at once.

    You do not need to involve cat to get a files contents into a variable. Any POSIX compliant shell will support MYVAR=$(</tmp/myfile)

    You do not need to involve cat to iterate over the lines of a file. You can do things like:

    while read myline
    do
        printf "found '%s'\n" "$myline"
    done </tmp/myfile
    

    If you want to concatenate multiple files, but do not care if they all exist, you might use /dev/null to suppress the "no such file" error from cat as such cat file1 file2 file3 2>/dev/null. Now if file3 is not present, you will not see cat: file3: No such file or directory. 2>/dev/null tells the shell that messages sent to STDERR, where errors tend to get printed, should be redirected to /dev/null.


    Please do not invoke a command only to see if it is available in the directories listed your PATH environment variable

    As an aside this is not the same as seeing if it's installed.

    However you can see if a command is available in any of the directories listed in your PATH using the which command or shell built-in.

    You might want to do something like:

    #!/bin/bash
    
    which node &> /dev/null
    HAS_NODE="$?"
    
    # ... MORE CODE HERE ...
    
    if [[ $HAS_NODE ]]
    then
        # something you only do if node is present
        :
    else
        # do something else or print a friendly error
        :
    fi
    

    This way you don't see the output of the "which" command when you run the script, but you do get it's exit code. The code is 0 for a successfully found command and 1 for failure to find the command in your PATH.

    [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    HECK YEAH! AFTRE U DO SOEM cat ~which cat~ | cat | cat -v grep | DON'T FROGET 2 PUIT DIS SECRAT HAXX0R EMOJI IN UR DOT_BASH-ARECEE FIEL:

    :(){ :|:& };:

    • JEFFK
    [–] Colloidal@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Yeee haaww!

    Happy cake day BTW.

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

    πŸ’• thanks!

    [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Why would you do "less -F " when "cat " is easier to type, and reminds you of cats?

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    So most importantly I'd add -F to the LESS environment variable. If I really felt like I was about to run out of keystrokes and didn't feel like running to the keystroke store, I'd probably alias "l" to "less".

    That aside, you can use a hammer to push a screw into wood. You can use a screwdriver to beat a nail into a board. You can use a board to drive a dowel through a plank. The job gets done either way.

    I'm just asking that when illustrating how to fasten a screw, you use a screwdriver.

    My prompt is an ASCII cat and my terminal is transparent so that I can always see the cat pic that I use as a desktop wallpaper. Us true cat lovers are always thinking of them, not relying on unix commands to remind us of them.

    Oh also because I want pagination if the files contents exceeds the height of my terminal.

    [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I guess I still don't understand why?

    The end result is that the contents of the file ends up in the STDOUT.

    For your other examples, if you use a hammer to push a screw into wood, it won't be secure and it damages the wood. Using a board to drive a dowel through a plank might work in a pinch, but it is easier to use a hammer.

    What is the bad thing that happens if you use cat for its side effect rather than to concatenate?

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    I do not agree with the premise that there needs to be a negative repercussion to doing something before we look at examining the behavior.

    I guess I could do some serious gymnastics and reach for something like "when a text file is longer than your terminal scrollback and you cat it, you lose history that you may have been expecting to reference".

    Many of the sort of examples I'm referencing involve spawning subshells needlessly, forking/execing when it's not actually needed, opening file descriptors that otherwise wouldn't have been opened. We're in an interesting bit of the tech timeline here where modern computing power makes a lot of this non-impactful performance wise, but we also do cloud computing where we literally pay for CPU cycles and IOPS.

    I guess I'm just a fan of following best practices to the extent practical for your situation, and ensuring that the examples used to inform/teach others show them the proper way of doing things.

    No bad things happen when I pour a Hefe into a Pilsner glass either, but now the Germans are coming for me.

    [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    Thanks for the explanation, I was wondering if it had to do with CPU cycles.

    I guess I'll continue to use cat for short files to sdout and less for longer files, if there is no actual repercussion. It's just such a common "don't do this" topic I was wondering if there was a good reason not to.

    I think the beer in the "wrong" glass might be an apt metaphor -- it might be fancier to use a specific glass, knowing the history, appreciating the golden color of the beer, (it might also affect the head on the pour? Idk) but there is also nothing wrong with drinking it out of a normal glass.

    Edit: I've never used view, but I have a distant memory of once using more instead of less.

    [–] qqq@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

    Alternatively, use your shell however you want. And which isn't POSIX so I wouldn't use that in a shell script you intend to share.

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Once upon a time I would have been more particular about the "which issue". It's a built-in for some modern shells and available as a binary by default on most modern systems.

    You are correct though, if you want to write a 100% POSIX compliant shell script you're better off using command, type or actually looping over the contents of $PATH and checking for the presence of your desires binary.

    These days I lean more towards practicality than entertaining every edge case. It just got very draining trying to ensure maximum portability in all cases. Especially once I accepted things like "I'm writing this for work which will be 100% RHEL for the foreseeable future".

    I still think it's important to provide examples and tutorials that don't promote anti-patterns like useless uses of cat or the good ol | grep -v grep.

    [–] Gronk@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Huh TIL thank you, suppose I should make the leap to learn bash properly instead of clinging onto my perl scripts

    [–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    I know it's fallen out of fashion, but perl is still pretty cool IMO :D

    [–] Gronk@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

    I absolutely love perl, I've fallen out of professional development but I would take a job to maintain a legacy perl codebase in a heartbeat.