this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
285 points (99.0% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
1120 readers
951 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, there's two possible interpretations:
(1) I'm illiterate, and these words are the results of me mashing my fists against the keyboard in a coincidence so unlikely, it practically proves there are infinite universes just to make it plausible; or
(2) I was intentionally calling attention to the absurdity of prosecuting clearly legal conduct using pretextual lawfare "conspiracy" charges.
If they passed a law to make something illegal then it isn’t “clearly lawful” conduct.
That’s how laws work…
Them boots ain't going to lick themselves. Good it just be tiring defending bad policy everyday. I hope you're paid well, and can't sleep at night.
Pointing out the tautology that breaking the law is in fact illegal isn’t supporting the police or defending particular laws.
If you were capable of any critical thought you would understand this.
Masks, he was handing out something every single business was not just a couple years ago.
I didn’t say it was a good law.
You have problems with object permanence don't you?
The people with cognitive issues are the ones claiming that breaking the law isn’t illegal.
Whether the law is just or constitutional are separate questions, and one of those questions can only be answered in the Supreme Court.
No law has ever been ruled unconstitutional.
Or immoral
It’s still a law until it is struck down by the Supreme Court, and breaking the law is illegal.
Which I thought was self evident but several people responding here clearly don’t comprehend this.
wow, that's a fucking dumb take.