this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
832 points (99.3% liked)

News

30289 readers
3789 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

religions don't deserve to exist.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Religion is the last mental illness you can't call out or treat. When you have Mike Huckabees et al going around ushering in the End Times, we should have the power to medicate these people into a barely functional stupor.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They can exist - if they pay taxes.

I'd rather they not, though.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sure but you might be making some assumptions that don't really apply here.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You mean assumptions about the 800 dead hidden babies in what is a very common finding inthese settings? Those assumptions?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think they had a valid and good reason to hide 800 dead babies in a septic tank?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't a septic tank.

It was a structure with 20 compartments which was originally designed as some kind of sewage management system but was never used as such.

So your question is really, do I think they had a valid and good reason to bury 800 infants, who had died from various bacterial and viral infections over a long period of time.

The obvious answer to that is yes.

It was a refuge for mothers and children. There's no indication of any abuse or neglect of the deceased at this time. I'm sure there are many valid criticisms to be made about this time and this place, and certainly there are valid criticisms to be made about religion, but this refuge is not the baby murder facility you're looking for.

There's a snopes article with a lot more information which challenges the assumptions you're making:

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/06/18/796-children-septic-tank-ireland/

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

Except that Snopes article does not even agree with you.

It's time you stopped excusing and glossing over the atrocities committed.

Sources on how fucked up Irish mother and baby homes were:

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

the idea of banning religion is painfully tyrannical, like how could you do that without instituting a thought police or a state sanctioned belief system...

however, in reality, they most toxic part of religion of organised religions, when they are big institutions fighting for political power rather than maintaining their beliefs and communities.

possible solution: progressive tax on religious institutions based on their size, a small community of 50 to 100? tax free, you have 1000s of congregants? start rising, megachurches with 1000 thousand people? 95% tax...

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

banning religion? I didn't say ban it.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

i assumed you wanted them gone.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I do. religion is a profound evil, and the cause of nearly all human suffering.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

God has caused the bloodiest and most brutal wars ever fought, which were all based on religious hatred. Millions have died simply because ‘God told’ Hindus, Muslims, Jews, and Christians it would be a ‘good idea’ for them to kill each other.

  • George Carlin, Comedian and Social Critic

The most detestable wickedness, the most horrid cruelties, and the greatest miseries, that have afflicted the human race have had their origin in this thing called revelation, or revealed religion. It has been . . . the most destructive to . . . the peace and happiness of man.

  • Thomas Paine, Political Philosopher (1796)

The bloodiest wars in history have been religious wars.

  • Richard Nixon, even this Dick thinks so
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think religion itself is evil. But corporate religion. Organizations and individuals that claim religion as the reasons for thier own sin for profit. People waving the bible as an excuse to do harm unto others.

Worship of a higher power or purpose shouldn't ever be used as a reason or means to commit sins. That's the major problem. Corruption and hypocrisy is rampant because people gather power under the flag of religion. Power easily corrupts the more it gathers.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

agree 100%

but will be pedantic and complain about your usage of "sin", as it is a Christian concept and not necessarily a bad thing.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Sin/evil deeds then. Many decent religions denounce evil deed and have good morals. Then there are other religions that promote sacrifice of life (your own or others).