this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4574 readers
93 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello and join me in standing in solidarity with Iran against Isn'trael, and mourn for the innocents that died from the unprovoked attack.

โ€ข Matrix homeserver and space
โ€ƒ โ—ฆ Theory discussion group now on Lemmygrad
โ€ข Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen

Oh and if you have money to spare, consider supporting Lemmy development

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Neither of these are exactly "soft" power, I think you're misinterpreting the term somewhat.

Soft power isn't so much to do with "diplomatic" power, but mainly the ability to more subtly influence others through positive attraction, such as through culture, religion, arts, film, music, fashion etc (such as Hollywood films acting as propaganda for US capitalist ideas, even when not made to explicitly do so). And in all honesty this is arguably one of China's weakest ways of projecting itself overseas, compared to the west. I'm just struggling to see how that really ties into the discussion here.

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is an example of China using soft power.

[โ€“] 666@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

soft powยทer

noun

a persuasive approach to international relations, typically involving the use of economic or cultural influence.

Everything I described falls under that, with their history of being the most level-headed economic player and growing more and more advanced by the day helps them out in their diplomacy. If you want an example that fits more of your definition, then I would point to the massive amount of brain-drain from the United States to China. I also mentioned productive forces. There is no misunderstanding here.

https://www.intelligentliving.co/why-chinese-scientists-leaving-us-stem/#%3A%7E%3Atext=By+2021%2C+a+striking+67%2Cworld%27s+scientific+expertise+is+centered.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/april-13/mother-of-all-bombs-afghanistan

This is older and was before China was leading the top 20 academic journals. They aren't so weak when they are successfully draining and using their "soft-power" to attract the brightest minds to their nation. They would lose a lot of this if they were to directly intervene or deploy in Iran against the United States.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3314949/us-brain-drain-set-gather-pace-academics-seek-posts-outside-trumps-america

This one is more recent.