this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)

Public Transport

498 readers
1 users here now

Everything about public transportation!

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

Sounds like gadgetbahn.

If we want to solve for capacity we have this.

There are no sleeping wagons during the day because people rarely sleep during the day.

Also having narrow ladder to get to half the wagon for sure will be great for elderly and disabled people.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like gadgetbahn.

What specifically about this solution makes it a gadgetbahn? Specifics are important here - what makes it less practical than current night train solutions?

If we want to solve for capacity we have this.

How does a bilevel car improve the comfort and unit economics of the night train experience?

There are no sleeping wagons during the day because people rarely sleep during the day.

These wagons are intended to be operational specifically during night, when beds are vital. It's not a solution made for daytime travel, where we already have good configurations.

Also having narrow ladder to get to half the wagon for sure will be great for elderly and disabled people.

Having half of the spaces being accessible for elderly and disabled people seems like a good enough ratio, given their relative share of the population.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What specifically about this solution makes it a gadgetbahn? Specifics are important here - what makes it less practical than current night train solutions?

More walls means less wagon space, also if it was interested only for night travel, why half the wagon is seats? How is that better than a night wagon filled with multiple story beds and one filled with seating? And why are there giant screens if the wagon is interested for sleeping?

night train experience

These wagons are intended to be operational specifically during night, when beds are vital. It's not a solution made for daytime travel, where we already have good configurations.

From their site:

With have run Tests with over hundreds of participants, each trying our various pods. Our “users” have communicated a high attractiveness of our technology both for day and night usage.

Their website shows and mentions daytime travel as well. If it is intended only for night travel makes a bit more sense, but still seems like a gadgetbahn.

Having half of the spaces being accessible for elderly and disabled people seems like a good enough ratio, given their relative share of the population.

I don't think it's good engineering practice to just decided half your product will be unusable/unacceptable.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

More walls means less wagon space, also if it was interested only for night travel, why half the wagon is seats? How is that better than a night wagon filled with multiple story beds and one filled with seating? And why are there giant screens if the wagon is interested for sleeping?

The seats recline into beds, similar to business class seating on long haul flights.

A typical night train will probably run for something like 12 hours, meaning that you won't want to be lying down fully for the whole trip.

On night trains, you typically book either a seat or a bed. The seats are an downright awful experience for anyone spending the night on the train. Seating-only wagons really have no purpose on night trains.

Their website shows and mentions daytime travel as well. If it is intended only for night travel makes a bit more sense, but still seems like a gadgetbahn.

See the previous note about night trains typically running for both sleeping hours and non-sleeping hours.

Again, I don't think these trains are intended for general purpose travel, they are specifically designed to be a better experience for overnight trips. I would not want to see them replace regular trains, that would clearly be a mistake.

I don't think it's good engineering practice to just decided half your product will be unusable/unacceptable

This is provably false - if this were true, then every bathroom would be built to full accessibility standards, but they are not. Some bathrooms get built to full accessibility standards, and the others only accommodate the majority of the population.

Good accessibility engineering means that your product can accommodate people with different requirements. With half of the seating being available without having the ability to climb ladders, this certainly fulfils that requirement.

load more comments (9 replies)