this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
387 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

72647 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (10 children)

It does add latency, you need 1-2ms to upscale the frame. However, if you are using a lower render resolution (instead of going up in resolution while rendering internally the same) then the latency will be lower because you have a higher frame rate

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Yeah, so it doesn’t add latency. It takes like 1-2ms iirc in the pipeline, which like you said is less than/the same/negligibly more than it would take to render at the native resolution.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Which also means it's not possible to use it to go to 1000 fps

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So it has limits? Oh no….. At 1000fps you can’t do much rendering effects at all. Luckily no one, and I do literally mean no one, plays games at 1000fps.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but that also means there's no FPS advantage at all at 500 Hz using DLSS and people do play at 500Hz

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you’re playing games at 500fps you don’t need DLSS. What is your point? Again - it’s for situations where you can’t get a good framerate at the settings you want to use.

How is this hard to understand?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My point is my 2060 can't reach 500 fps even if you run the game in DLSS. You need a more powerful GPU, DLSS can only increase your FPS if the FPS is terrible, it can't boost you from 250 to 500

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would if DLSS didn't add latency, but it does

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It adds rendering time, not "latency" btw.

DLSS improves framerates at basically no cost, to let people hit playable or high framerates at quality levels they couldn't without it. It's not for hitting 500fps, it's for hitting 30/60/100 etc.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

It doesn't render anything, so it can't add rendering time, it just generates an upscaled version of an already rendered frame

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)