FreedomAdvocate

joined 2 months ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Push back against what? All of these countries’ governments moving away from MS are doing it for digital sovereignty, nothing else. They want to be in control of their data.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 13 hours ago

I know what DLSS is, I want to know exactly what you think in there says what you think it does.

So are you going to actually substantiate your claims with evidence/proof or no?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 13 hours ago

I’m not sure if English isn’t your first language, or if you’re just being wilfully obtuse, but I didn’t call it emulation. I said it is essentially emulation, like WINE. I know WINE isn’t emulation, which is why I said it is “essentially” emulation because it’s doing the same thing - converting calls from one set of APIs to work on other hardware/architecture. It’s not emulation, but it’s essentially the same thing.

Why would Nvidia want competition? AMD don’t want competition either, but they made FSR work on everything because they were so far behind Nvidia (and because it was all done in software, requiring no special hardware) that they have to give it away to try and catch up.

Companies making proprietary tech is not anti-consumer - unless of course you think that everything other than making everything free and open source is “anti-consumer”, which I am thinking you might?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, so it doesn’t add latency. It takes like 1-2ms iirc in the pipeline, which like you said is less than/the same/negligibly more than it would take to render at the native resolution.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So surely someone playing on their pc with American flags instead of pride flags isn’t going to hurt even the most delicate snowflake?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh so they came to their senses because of the backlash over their pathetic banning of this mod? That’s something at least, but they won’t be getting any praise from me until they stop banning things like this in the first place.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I said it’s essentially emulation, which it is. Its like WINE, which is also essentially emulation but isn’t emulation.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Nvidia can say what they want, but reviewers didn’t follow those.

Sounds like you need to find better GPU review sites.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Linking to an 81 page document isn’t helpful. What specifically in there are you referring to?

No it doesn’t. It allows you to run a game at a higher resolution for no reason at all

Other than the reasons like I said - running it at higher settings while maintaining a playable framerate. The point is you don’t have to lower settings as much with DLSS.

You fundamentally don’t understand what it is and what it allows you to do.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Way to miss the point. The point is that mods as trivial as the ones I said in single player games were banned because the owner didn’t like them, while the owner allowed the mods like you mentioned.

but 11 has Recall which is essentially AI spyware.

How do so many of you believe this? How did so many of you upvote this?

Windows 11 doesn't have Recall. If you have a Copilot+ PC you can opt-in to a preview of Recall currently. Those without a Copilot+ PC, ie. everyone in this thread who actually has a windows pc with Windows 11, do not have Recall and will not be getting Recall.

I assume you're talking about Recall, the feature that isn't even coming to 99.99% of the computers running windows, and still isn't even released officially outside of opt-in previews, right?

 

X has received executive orders from the Indian government requiring X to block over 8,000 accounts in India, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment of the company’s local employees. The orders include demands to block access in India to accounts belonging to international news organizations and prominent X users.

X is exploring all possible legal avenues available to the company. Unlike users located in India, X is restricted by Indian law in its ability to bring legal challenges against these executive orders. However, we encourage all users who are impacted by these blocking orders to seek appropriate relief from the courts.

view more: next ›