this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
502 points (99.4% liked)

science

20249 readers
346 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And a few years later the bacteria is found to cause even worse diseases...

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know it's a joke, but that's almost certainly not going to be the case. Pathogenic bacteria have fundamentally different metabolism and genes.

What is more likely is either: ecological imbalance or the bacteria only metabolises the harmful chemicals under extreme deprivation of other carbon sources, which is never realistic, so they never do

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well I mean if people throw off their gut microbiome by overloading on this bacteria, it might still be harmful in that way. It does not need to be pathogenic in that sense.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Its actually hard to survive the human gut

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

But it is neutralized by microplastics...

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

But before that they will discover some nutrients which are very beneficial for this bacteria so people will also consume that by the loads.