this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
456 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

72957 readers
2956 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 191 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Here's the thing .. as crazy as a notebook with passwords sounds, it's not accessible to someone across the internet.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Password managers check the URL before giving its data. A human being can be fooled into giving it to a fake web site.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

TBF, they can be fooled too.

Bitwarden warns against using autofill on load for that very reason, as then simply loading a malicious page might cause it to provide passwords to such a site.

And then, a human when a site doesn't autofill, is more likely to just go "huh, weird" and do it manually.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 17 hours ago

they can be fooled too.

Makes it harder: when I go to the wrong website, the manager simply doesn't suggest credentials (it does not have) for it. That causes me to wonder why.

Without a password manager, a user is never prompted to wonder. They'd simply not notice.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You've always got the human element, bypassing security features; but extra little hurdles like a password manager refusing to autofill an unknown url is at least one more opportunity for the user to recognize that something's wrong and back away.

If you're already used to manually typing in the auth details, you may not even notice you're not on the site you were expecting.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, what? How does autofill get fooled?

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Someone manages to maliciously sneak username and password fields onto a site that store what is entered as soon as it's typed. They don't even have to be visible to the user and bitwarden will fill them in as soon as the page loads.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bitwarden will only autofill if the domain matches.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Right, "maliciously sneak", as in they've either gained access to make changes to the site ditectly, or they've found a way to inject their scripts to steal creds.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

And how is that any different from not having a password manager?

Yes, if someone hijacks a domain they can get credentials intended for that domain. A password manager doesn't make a huge difference here, because why would they make the site look any different than normal?

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They don't even have to be visible to the user and bitwarden will fill them in as soon as the page loads.

I guess you didn't read most of the comment.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No, he did, here's where the confusion is.

Serinus is asking if the site in question needs to be compromised. In other words, can the attacker compromise a random site to fool your password manager into entering credentials for Gmail.com, or does the attacker have to compromise Gmail.com to do that?

Because those two attacks are very different levels of complexity.

And frankly, if someone compromises the site you're actually trying to visit, there's simply no defense against that at all.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

but:

  1. way less convenient to generate dozens and dozens of unique, complex passwords. which means it’s less likely to be used/updated as much as it should be.

  2. not tied into MFA which is an additional layer of security and convenience

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, It's actually quite a secure way to store passwords, since it requires physical access.

I knew a guy who had a drawer full of slips of paper with passwords written on. He called it the "security drawer". Made me smile, but probably shouldn't have been advertising it.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 12 hours ago

Oh I know him. What a weirdo. Fun guy tho. Did he move what’s his new address anyway?

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just maybe don't plaster "THESE ARE MY SECRETS" on the cover. Security through obscurity.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

My mom had a nice little notebook for passwords. But when she passed, we couldn't find it anywhere... We went through the whole apartment, everything.

Not having her passwords made a lot of things harder, closing her accounts, accessing her laptop, phone, etc. So while you shouldn't advertise it, do tell a few people where to find it if they need to.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

INTERNET PASSWORD LOGBOOK is probably a paper slip that you can remove, and then it'll just be a blank leather journal.

Now a REALLY secure physical logbook would just have the cover of a boring, unremarkable-looking book on the outside.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Please hold your password notebook in front of the laptop camera.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

It depends on what the user fills it with.

Even the objectively safest solutions will be much shorter, and have less entropy, than what a pw-manager can deal with.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Their Ring camera that points directly at the desk they keep this notebook on: "it's showtime"