I mean, it's obviously the price that pushed Android to where it is today.
The fact is, you can buy some models of Android phones (new) for under $75. This makes smart phones affordable even in developing countries. That fact has sent the number of smart phones in people's hands through the roof. And honestly, part of what makes them cheap to manufacture is in fact that FLOSS base, allowing any company to develop one.
Ok, that's a pretty different idea...
I wonder how feasible it is to run current through a whole chunk of drying concrete on a build site... It does sound potentially difficult, but on the other hand, carbon negative concrete might just be worth the added difficulty.
Now the trick will be to convince anyone to use a material that is even slightly more expensive, sometimes achievable, but always a challenge.
That's what you have to do for sharing!?
Someone definitely told me that there was library sharing for jellyfin... Is this the only option?
There's a simple answer to that. When many people first got started with Plex, it was awesome! Way better than xbmc! Also, jellyfin didn't exist.
Once you've had things up and running smoothly for years, changing everything is a hard sell. You could spend hours setting it up, fixing little inconsistencies, manually matching titles that had weird names, etc. or you could just... not.
I hope I've cleared things up for you! The answer is laziness!
In my experience, as you increase the quality level of a jpeg, the compression level drops significantly, much more than with some other formats, notably PNG. I'd be curious to see comparisons with png and gif. I wouldn't be surprised if the new jpeg compresses better at some resolutions, but not all, or with only some kind of images.
Honestly, It's a pretty major fuck up. It makes the headline inaccurate by 2 orders of magnitude...
Cause a million bees is what... A dozen hives? I just googled it and it's literally my body weight in bees. Which now that I've said it out loud, is sort of terrifying, but you know what I mean.
Again, the argument I'm trying to make is that, by the time one can settle Mars without supplies from Earth
Well, that's not exactly the goal. No nation is really self-sufficient in modern society. Everyone engages in trade. So the question is really, when will a space colony become profitable or maintainable? And that's trickier to answer, because it isn't "not for hundreds of years", but it also isn't now, it's somewhere in between.
Cheaper access to space would change the equation immensely. Being cheaper to resupply would mean the colony wouldn't have to be as profitable to be sustainable. In-situ resource utilisation (using water found off of earth for drinking, oxygen and fuel) will also make an enormous difference as it would reduce the amount of supplies needed from earth. (This is incidentally one of the main goals of NASA's Artemis program, to figure out how to utilize water resources on the moon)
It was the same situation when Europeans settled the Americas, at first it was just a money suck. Entire colonies were lost, lots of people died, they weren't really prepared. But then they started to figure out what crops worked there, how to survive harsh winters, etc. Once they figured out how to make the most of this new land, they thrived. Unfortunately, the way they treated the locals was pretty horrific. Fortunately, we're pretty certain there aren't any locals on the moon or Mars.
Truth be told, I think a Mars colony won't happen for quite some time, but I believe a moon colony will certainly happen before 2100. And if we're lucky, maybe since orbital colonies. That's where the future really lies, orbital colonies.
Actually, they have launched deep space NASA missions. The Europa clipper went to Jupiter on a falcon heavy just last year.
An easy copout, I could have predicted that...
Well I'm happy to be done with this exchange.
Oh my God... In that whole post, you've said absolutely nothing of substance! That was astonishing! I mean, actually impressive in a way...
In my post I had essentially only asked one question (and that question was "what are you actually suggesting?") and you managed to not even address it. Instead, you went on a meandering tangent about Dr Strangelove. You continue to make assertions about military doctrine, that actual decisions about actual, tangible weapons are incorrect, but instead of explaining how they were incorrect or suggesting what specific alternative choices should have been made, you instead talk about vague philosophical misunderstandings... That's bullshit.
Honestly, as useless as it is, I feel like I have to ask at this point, are you an LLM? (I can't really expect any useful response to this whether you are an LLM or not, but it still feels right to ask)
So you're telling me that millionaires can now literally buy a trump card? Awesome...