The UK government’s latest relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) guidance calls on schools to be “mindful” that there is “significant debate” about transgender identities, and staff “should be careful not to endorse any particular view or teach it as fact”.
The Department for Education (DfE) finally published its long-awaited, updated statutory guidance on RSHE on Tuesday (15 July), as well as its response to the consultation held on proposed changes to it.
A statutory review of RSHE guidance was announced by the former Conservative government under Rishi Sunak in March 2023, after the DfE said it had received “disturbing” reports of “inappropriate material” being taught in some schools. Education secretary Gillian Keegan, who supported outing trans pupils to parents, said the review was needed to “make sure all children are protected from inappropriate content”.
The revised guidelines will come into force from 1 September 2026, replacing the previous guidance, and sets out the legal duties schools must comply with when teaching RSHE.
Within the 42-page document, points 67 to 72 – equal to around a page in length – outline guidance in relation to “gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender content”.
The word “transgender” does not appear anywhere else in the document.
[…]
Pupils should be taught “the facts and the law about biological sex and gender reassignment”, the updated guidance says, and they should “recognise that people have legal rights by virtue of their biological sex which are different from the rights of those of the opposite sex with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment”.They should also learn to recognise that people with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, as with the other protected characteristics, have protection from discrimination and should be treated with respect and dignity.”
State schools should be “mindful” that “beyond the facts and the law about biological sex and gender reassignment there is significant debate” and “should be careful not to endorse any particular view or teach it as fact”. The guidance goes on to give a specific example that schools should not “teach as fact that all people have a gender identity”.
It is also important to be “mindful to avoid any suggestion that social transition is a simple solution to feelings of distress or discomfort”, the guidance goes on to warn, and materials that could “encourage pupils to question their gender” should be avoided.
UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
This part:
Imagine if the government held this view for any other issue where's there's a public debate, like the view that vaccines are a public health benefit is controversial these days, should schools avoid 'endorsing any particular view' on vaccines to avoid offending anti-vaxxers?
I'm curious what you think gender identity means here. You state that sex is binary 'with exceptions' and should be taught as such, but I imagine the number of people without a gender identity to be fairly small (I can't image there's that many agender people). Do you think cis people don't have a gender identity?
So not a binary. Male, female and exceptions makes three, not two. Intersex people make up an estimated 1.7% of the population, they deserve more than just to be a footnote. What harm does teaching kids that sex isn't binary, but bimodal, actually do?
There's more to biological sex than chromosomes, things like hormone levels, muscle mass, other secondary sexual characteristics play a part and aren't static. A trans woman who has taken oestrogen for a while will have a muscle mass akin to a cis woman's.
The government also hasn't actually said what it means by 'biological sex' anywhere, you're just assuming chromosomes because that's what you believe.
Is there significant public debate, in the absence of established facts, in the area of vaccine benefits?
No, and I don't know the numbers, but I do know it's not everyone. If the numbers are similar to the number of intersex people, then the way it is taught should be the same.
That figure includes men who have a urethral opening somewhere other than at the tip of the penis, and women with a mild overabundance of sex hormones which can cause hirsutism and male pattern baldness. It is beyond the realm of credibility to call such people exceptions to sexual dimorphism in humans; the actual figure is much less. It is promoted by intersex campaign groups who understandably want more recognition, but it's not reasonable.
Animals that are categorised as different species can mate and produce fertile offspring; what is stored in computers is an analogue quantity not a platonic binary; some substances display properties of both solids and liquids and the interface between substances can't be categorised as either. This doesn't mean the categorisations are useless or wrong, only that they have limitations.
I don't think anyone proposes that muscle mass be part of the concept of biological sex.
You started off by saying that referring to sex as static was ridiculous, but as far as I can tell, it's not ridiculous (in response you brought up something that no-one thinks is part of sex, and something which is not related to sex being static or changing) and not really part of this topic, so let's leave that part.