this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
27 points (86.5% liked)

science

20609 readers
427 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting, but take with a grain of salt:

Another caveat is the composition of the sample. The Nurses' Health Study that the sample was drawn from is made up of overwhelmingly white women residing in the United States. "Since sex preferences and reproductive behaviors vary across cultures, religions, or countries … the sex ratio distribution pattern observed in our study may not apply to other societies," the researchers acknowledge.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's true...

But applicable to almost all our medical information.

Like, the BMI scale was developed in the 1800s by a Belgian astronomer, based solely on European men of that time period.

But people are really fucking insistent we keep it, because in 6th grade a gym teacher said it was important.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Body types vary a lot, any simplified measurement can't account for much and shouldn't be used on its own. However, it is fast, easy, and gives a decent ballpark of weight related health for most people. That makes it useful. More accurate things like impedance or displacement or pinch tests require equipment, a mess and/or patient discomfort.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah. But there's also the ponderial index, which still just uses height/weight and provides a much better result than BMI. Because when BMI was invented, a guy that was 5'8 was so tall they were statistically insignificant.

Like, there is a benefit from using a simple formula, but there's no reason to keep using an outdated one that we know has serious problems, when the medical community already made a better one...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpulence_index

Like, it's not perfect. Still has flaws...

But it's only 100 years old, compared to BMI at 200 years old.

And was invented by an actual medical.professional and not an astronomer.

So while you do have some good points, none of that is a reason to keep using BMI. Hell, pretty sure we can make an even better formula than Ponderal Index by now. And there's no reason not to.

Like math is a little harder, but why does that matter? Who's doing bmi by hand intead of plugging into a calculator on a webpage? Or just looking at a chart?

How hard the math is doesn't really matter.