this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
44 points (94.0% liked)
Programming
21725 readers
133 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah thats the point I was trying to make.
Why is it talked about so onesidedly when it is actually multi-facetted? The blog to me reads like: "there are legal reasons against AI and there are fanatic reasons against AI, so we yive you the option to disable it (but actually it's totally great as we all know and agree)."
I wish they'd addressed it in a more nuanced way or not at all. Just saying "It is now a config" would have been enough, but they went out of their way to point out only the subset of the arguments that can be easily dismissed.
Guess they have a product to sell that rides on the succsess of AI coding.
I don't see why they should need to address all the concerns specifically if they've provided the option people want anyway?
It seems they don't really force you to use the AI anyway so people could just ignore it if they wanted?
They don't need to.
It's my wish to read a blog that discusses the nuances, instead of onesided bla.