this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
63 points (97.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3246 readers
894 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The gerrymander would benefit the GOP and dilute Black and Brown voters’ power. The House may now decide its fate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Have no fear, Pedantic Man is here!

Almost every state has a House and a Senate. Nebraska (as well as the Virgin Islands and Guam, if you want to include territorial legislatures) operates a unicameral, technically non-partisan (as in, party affiliation isnt "officially" acknowledged), legislature.

You're welcome, citizen! Pedantic Man, up, up, and away!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks!

Nebraska dissolved their House in 1930s and while they had good reasons, it passed because of the push to legalize horse betting:

After a trip to Australia in 1931, George W. Norris, then U.S. senator for Nebraska, campaigned for reform, arguing that the bicameral system was based on the non-democratic British House of Lords, and that it was pointless to have two bodies of people doing the same thing and hence wasting money. He specifically pointed to the example of the Australian state of Queensland, which had adopted a unicameral parliament nearly ten years before. In 1934, voters approved a constitutional amendment to take effect with the 1936 elections, abolishing the Nebraska Senate and the Nebraska House of Representatives and granting their powers to a new unicameral body simply called the Nebraska Legislature. At 43 members, the new Nebraska Legislature was closer in size to the old 33-member Nebraska Senate than it was to the old 100-member Nebraska House of Representatives.[7][8]

Many possible reasons for the 1934 amendment's victory have been advanced: the popularity of George Norris; the Depression-era desire to cut costs; public dissatisfaction with the previous year's legislature; or even the fact that, by chance, it was on the ballot in the same year as an amendment to legalize parimutuel betting on horse races.[9] This final coincidence may have aided the measure's passage in Omaha, where the unicameral issue was not a pressing one but horse racing was. (Gambling interests campaigned for "yes" votes on all amendments in hopes of assuring the horse-racing amendment's passage.)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Legislature#History

I legitimately didn't know about that

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Grew up in Nebraska. It's a point of really lame civic pride among the population that paid attention in elementary school social studies.

For some reason, I had it in my head that Maine also operated a unicameral, however that appears to not be the case. They tried to adopt it in 2009, but the measure failed. So, I'm not 100% sure what factoid I'm misremembering, but I know there is some strange kinship between Maine and Nebraska local politics.