this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Communism

2329 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not well read in Marxism so I'm probably not qualified to answer this, but the recurring issue with Communism seems to be the same as capitalism, in that it requires people to not be assholes in order to properly function.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What part of Communism "requires people to not be assholes to function?"

Why do you think Capitalism would function if people were not assholes?

[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The recurring issue with Communism in practice is that it requires true equality amongst its citizens and there's always some asshole or group of assholes who want power and dominion over others, so it seems to repeatedly fall into a practical dictatorship.

Capitalism at its best requires businesses to find and deploy the most effective and efficient means of product delivery in order to compete with each other, which means that the consumer will always have the best product at the best price allowed by the market. The problem is that greedy assholes either conglomerate competing companies into monopolies, or otherwise collude with one another to maximize their profit margins.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why does Communism require "true equality amongst its citizens?" What does that even mean, in practical terms? How would a group of people take advantage of this to form a "practical dictatorship?"

Capitalism does not deploy the most efficient means of product delivery, but the most profitable. It means weaker but more profitable products are pushed, and rampant consumerism of useless trinkets is pushed for profit. Collusion and monopoly are not why Capitalism cannot work, those are merely symptoms of a broader exploitative system that naturally decays due to issues like the Tendency for the Rate of Profit to Fall.

What of Marx have you read? Or any leftist theorist? I can make some suggestions for reading material if you wish.

[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why does Communism require "true equality amongst its citizens?" What does that even mean, in practical terms?

Do you imagine a communist system that has social classes?

How would a group of people take advantage of this to form a "practical dictatorship?"

Castro, Zedong, Putin

Capitalism does not deploy the most efficient means of product delivery, but the most profitable...

You're arguing Communism on a philosophical level against capitalism on a practical level.

What of Marx have you read? Or any leftist theorist?

As I said, I'm not well read and unprepared for the higher level argument you are seeking here.

I can make some suggestions for reading material if you wish.

I appreciate your desire to educate, but I'm too busy being exploited by the current system to dive further into social philosophy. When you guys are ready to rise up I'll be there, but I won't be a part of the debate on which system we should implement going forward.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Do you imagine a communist system that has classes of people?

If you are referring to the Marxian term, ie proletarians, bourgeois, etc. Of course not. Do you instead mean people must be paid equally, and there can be no management? Also of course not, Communism isn't a bunch of horizontal organization and equal pay.

Castro, Zedong, Putin

Putin is a Capitalist, so I am unsure of what you mean by including him here.

As for Mao and Castro, Mao lost power within the CPC over time and Castro retained power democratically, neither of which maintain your points. This appears to just be vibes.

You're arguing Communism on a philosophical level and capitalism on a practical level.

What on Earth does that mean? I am advocating for Communism on both practical and philosophical grounds, this is just gibberish.

As I said, I'm not well read and unprepared for the higher level argument you are seeking here.

I am trying to get to a base level of understanding so we can have a conversation. I wouldn't even call it an argument, I am just trying to get you to understand your own preconceptions.

I appreciate your desire to educate, but I'm too busy being exploited by the current system to dive further into social philosophy. When you guys are ready to rise up I'll be there, but I won't be a part of the debate on which system we should implement going forward.

Revolution doesn't happen just because people vibe it into existence, it's a consequence of deteriorating Material Conditions. If you don't have time to read Marx, why do you have time to discuss Marxism online with strangers? This entire convo would have been better spent comprehending the bigger picture of Marxism.

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not game theoretically aligned. It's not his fault, Game Theory didn't really get going until after his death

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, Matpat will save Marxism.

No, seriously, what problems does Marxism have, and how does Game Theory "solve" them or point them out?

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are different kinds of work which needs to be done for our society to function. These tasks have costs for those who perform them (lost time, spent energy, danger, boredom, etc).

In pure communism, everyone works hard and everyone is given the spoils of the work we collectively provide. But it is rational for any individual to not work as hard, because he will bear less of the cost of that work, but still realize the same gain

Therefore most people tend to shirk their duties, and the output of the entire collective drops. In order to maintain the system, the threat of violence is introduced, and we quickly get to Stalinist purges

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, vibes-based analysis that ignores all of Marxist theory on how a transition to Communism would work, and just vibes out how it would be. Nice.

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I described is exactly how it played out in about a dozen instances where a transition to communism was tried

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has it? Has it truly?

Your argument can be made against all forms of social services, and ignores that people work to get paid. This hasn't panned out in your game theory favor at all.

If you're trying to argue against higher stage Communism, "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs," then that also doesn't follow. Higher stage Communism has never been achieved by any AES country, so again, your example is false.

In no reading of your statement does it follow reality.

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about instead of just saying that I am wrong, describe to me how an individual in a higher stage communist state would be prevented from slacking in his duties (and still gaining "according to his need") without state induced violence

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think Communists believe upper-stage Communism can be achieved in our life time? No, it is only achievable after rapidly improving production. Communists advocate for naturally building up to that point through steady improvements and collectivizing production through Socialism, then lower stage Communism, then finally upper stage Communism.

Another thing - an upper stage Communist society would be both international and stateless. You're arguing against Anarcho-Communism, and poorly as well, not Marxism.

[–] doylio@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

You're still not answering my question.

But it's now clear that communism for you is a religion. Upper stage communism is the paradise that is promised to those who follow the tenets of the faith fully, and I am a heretic non-believer

I will not be continuing this discussion any further