this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
1163 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 88 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Support for what ever she decides is next, although I feel like the senate would be a better step. However the democrats dont really have a face to back that isnt some centerist that thinks its ok to play with the bully after they have taken your lunch money or someone that is older than Wonder Bread (tm).

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Imagine if AOC remained SML as long as Moscow Mitch.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

AOC SML or POTUS FTW

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

There's no path where she becomes Senate Majority Leader. You don't take the position off the corpse of your defeated opponent.

[–] troy_frizzell@mstdn.social 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sold on his face, but I do like the way Pritzker swings a bat. He's a bit centrist, but at least he's a fighter.

His problem is he's a billionaire. But as a stop gap, I think he could work.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

At this point, he is a billionaire by choice. He could donate to groups that work towards equitable living for the marginalized, but he doesn't. He only has a couple billion, but that's enough to make a very real impact for a lot of vulnerable people. This is very nearly the trolley problem. He can do nothing and let a lot of people die or he can intervene and save most but not all.

As Rush said (the band, not Limbaugh lol), If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That is also the philisophical crux of The Witcher series (books and games, not the TV show now starring the least-hot hemsworth)

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The show was such a disappointment. There was solid source material to work off of, and they just shit all over it. They did Henry Cavill dirty, and dragged the witcher IP through the mud so much so it will probably never be put on screen again to present the actual story.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

You never know, Hellboy got 3 different incarnations within 20 years despite having been a relatively unknown property outside of diehard comic readers.

Sadly they got progressively worse.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Id argue that he made a choice to use that as a cushion to allow him to devote himself to public service. I dont k ow if that is true, but my u derstanding is that he inherited this money. Doesnt mean he hs the same mindset of the person who accumulated it in the firstplace. Sins of the father and all.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Agreed, but my point is that most of us don't get to just choose to be a billionaire. He does. Because he could choose to fund different things or donate to groups and he chooses not to. I'm not indicting him on exploiting people to amass that wealth, but he has chosen to keep billions of dollars for himself when he could be putting a lot of his money towards fighting the very things he says we need to fight.

That doesn't necessarily make him a bad person; he just could be a whole hell of a lot better. I could donate more and don't because I'd like to one day maybe be able to work less than full time before I die. He could have decided to never work a day in his life and instead opted to work a public service job, so props to him for that, but there's still more I think he ought to be doing in these dire times.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They are going to basically offer her Chuck's Senate seat, unopposed, as long as she doesn't go after the nomination that they have already awarded to Newsom. He's the Next One Up!

[–] miked@piefed.social 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nooooooo!

He literally pushed to make being unhoused a crime.

[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Newsom is fine. The right smears him and California almost as much as they did HRC. Don't go along with their propaganda.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago

There's more than just the right's propaganda here. He's a better choice than any MAGA, surely, but not the "Dem" I'd want.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Newsom is not fine, fuck that guy

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately the way the system works, you basically have to vote for who you'd fuck less

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The electorate is still as old as hell and won’t like someone younger than them.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 days ago

That's why Barrack Obama lost.