this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)
196
17508 readers
479 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does this mean you're not going to randomly ban people who disagree with you anymore? I hope so, but at least we have !onehundrednintysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone if that continues to happen.
I banned Stamets a couple times over the last year for posting an anti-trans meme and a different instance of not tagging NSFW. Stamets is a repeat offender, hence the ban from Moss. Banning people for not tagging NSFW is in the stated rules. Repeat offenders are held to a higher standard. The "trolling" tag was because they plainly refused to tag the post.
Maybe remove Stamets being a whiney troll about having their transphobia removed.
Edit: before they deleted these comments and rage quit, they complained of having their transphobia deleted by the mods.
Okay, I've taken a look and so far I've seen the following.
You were never banned (except for one time being banned by moss), but Peachy did remove several posts from you. One of those removed posts was an "anti-trans meme" (probably not intended by you this way) and a different instance of you not tagging NSFW. I believe you when you say you never posted anything transphobic, but it certainly seems like the meme has transphobic elements. It starts with saying "you will never be a real mushroom" ("you will never be a real woman"). It also says the subject never will have spores (reference to trans woman missing "real" genitals). Furthermore, it finishes with "You are a small kitten twisted by fabric and wool into a crude mockery of nature's perfection", which is very close to things like "You are a man with a dress and implants and a crude mockery of nature's perfection". This might seem far-fetched, but each line is extremely similar to common transphobic sayings.
So, enough meme analysis and talk about the things you've said:
So this is false, but I can understand why you might have thought that because those removals were on blahaj and you might have checked the logs for lemmy.world
Peachy didn't say you were "being transphobic", they said they removed an "anti-trans meme", which is true.
I hope you can see why a mod who sees someone posting a (to some) blatantly obvious transphobic meme, later sees them not marking a post as NSFW, is unlikely to see their side of the issue when they later complain about a ban. I can understand that you're upset (rightfully so, I don't think the ban was justified) and have no interest in participating in this community going forward, but we're not making things up.
So Stamets was lying and saying Peachy was lying. What a shock, projection from the bigots.
bye
I might buy that for Stamets but not necessarily for the other people who commented in that thread. Some of those people had very illegitimate bans indeed.
It's in the modlog, you don't need to take my word for it.
We have an email people can reach out to. We all have access to it so we can keep each other accountable. If anyone feels that they've been unfairly banned, they can reach out to the email and a mod unrelated to the ban will address it. We've let go of a mod in the past for unfairly banning people, it's not like we're going to defend each other for no reason. We're a team, sure, but my justice-flavored autism isn't going to hold that relationship over doing the right thing.
this.